S1665 Comparative Effectiveness of Vedolizumab (Entyvio) vs Ustekinumab (Sterla) in Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease Stratified by Biologic Exposure: A Real-World Analysis

Introduction: Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab are approved biologic agents used in the management of Crohn’s disease (CD). Limited real-world data exist comparing their efficacy in patients with fistulizing CD, especially when stratified by prior anti-TNFα exposure. This study aimed to evaluate 2-year outcomes in patients with and without previous biologic use. Methods: Using TriNetX, 2 retrospective cohort analyses were conducted on patients with CD of the large intestine with fistula (International Classification of Diseases-10: K50.113) treated with Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab. Patients were stratified into biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced groups. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes included colectomy, corticosteroid use, infections (TB/CMV/PJP), malignancy, extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), and fistula-related procedures (e.g., seton placement, fistulotomy, botulinum injection). Results: After matching, 633 patients per arm were included in the biologic-naïve group , and 981 per arm in the biologic-experienced group. Across both strata, colectomy, oral steroid use, DVT/PE, TB/CMV/PJP infection, and surgical fistula interventions showed no significant differences between drugs. However, vedolizumab was associated with significantly higher use of IV steroids in both biologic-naïve (43.3% vs 36.2%, OR 1.35, P = 0.01) and biologic-experienced groups (46.0% vs 39.7%, OR 1.30, P = 0.005). In the naïve cohort, vedolizumab was linked to a lower rate of EIMs (47.4% vs 53.2%, OR 0.79, P = 0.038), whereas rates were comparable in the experienced group. Notably, botulinum injections occurred exclusively in Ustekinumab-treated naïve patients (1.6%, P = 0.001) and Vedolizumab-treated experienced patients (1.0%, P = 0.002), though clinical implications remain unclear. Conclusion: Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab showed similar real-world effectiveness in preventing colectomy and reducing complications in fistulizing CD regardless of biologic history. The higher steroid use in vedolizumab-treated patients may indicate differences in disease severity, time to onset of response, or therapeutic strategy. Differences in EIM rates and surgical interventions were marginal and require further investigation. These results support the individualized use of biologics in complex CD phenotypes and highlight the need for head-to-head prospective studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134120.16614.75
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1665 Comparative Effectiveness of Vedolizumab (Entyvio) vs Ustekinumab (Sterla) in Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease Stratified by Biologic Exposure: A Real-World Analysis

Sushovan Guha, Aakriti Soni, Rakahn Haddadin
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1665 Comparative Effectiveness of Vedolizumab (Entyvio) vs Ustekinumab (Sterla) in Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease Stratified by Biologic Exposure: A Real-World Analysis

Sushovan Guha, Aakriti Soni, Rakahn Haddadin
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab are approved biologic agents used in the management of Crohn’s disease (CD). Limited real-world data exist comparing their efficacy in patients with fistulizing CD, especially when stratified by prior anti-TNFα exposure. This study aimed to evaluate 2-year outcomes in patients with and without previous biologic use. Methods: Using TriNetX, 2 retrospective cohort analyses were conducted on patients with CD of the large intestine with fistula (International Classification of Diseases-10: K50.113) treated with Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab. Patients were stratified into biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced groups. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Primary outcomes included colectomy, corticosteroid use, infections (TB/CMV/PJP), malignancy, extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), and fistula-related procedures (e.g., seton placement, fistulotomy, botulinum injection). Results: After matching, 633 patients per arm were included in the biologic-naïve group , and 981 per arm in the biologic-experienced group. Across both strata, colectomy, oral steroid use, DVT/PE, TB/CMV/PJP infection, and surgical fistula interventions showed no significant differences between drugs. However, vedolizumab was associated with significantly higher use of IV steroids in both biologic-naïve (43.3% vs 36.2%, OR 1.35, P = 0.01) and biologic-experienced groups (46.0% vs 39.7%, OR 1.30, P = 0.005). In the naïve cohort, vedolizumab was linked to a lower rate of EIMs (47.4% vs 53.2%, OR 0.79, P = 0.038), whereas rates were comparable in the experienced group. Notably, botulinum injections occurred exclusively in Ustekinumab-treated naïve patients (1.6%, P = 0.001) and Vedolizumab-treated experienced patients (1.0%, P = 0.002), though clinical implications remain unclear. Conclusion: Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab showed similar real-world effectiveness in preventing colectomy and reducing complications in fistulizing CD regardless of biologic history. The higher steroid use in vedolizumab-treated patients may indicate differences in disease severity, time to onset of response, or therapeutic strategy. Differences in EIM rates and surgical interventions were marginal and require further investigation. These results support the individualized use of biologics in complex CD phenotypes and highlight the need for head-to-head prospective studies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.