Influence of pre-acquisition stress on fear learning and regulation as a function of sex and menstrual-cycle groups

Fear conditioning protocols are widely used to investigate fear learning and regulation, with clinical implications for post-traumatic stress and anxiety disorders. In real-world settings, fear learning often occurs under stress, affecting memory strength and regulation. However, laboratory findings on stress effects remain inconsistent, possibly due to the lack of consideration for sex and menstrual-cycle groups, given sex hormones receptors' abundance in fear- and stress-related brain regions. This study examined the impact of 1) pre-acquisition stress and 2) cortisol reactivity on fear processes across sex and menstrual-cycle groups (hormonal data unavailable). A total of 208 participants were exposed to a stressor (men (n = 24), women using oral contraceptives (OCs; n = 25), and women with a menstrual cycle in the early follicular (EF; n = 24) or late follicular phase (LF; n = 26)) or control condition (men (n = 29), OCs (n = 23), EF (n = 26), LF (n = 31)) before undergoing fear acquisition (Context A), where two colors were paired with shock (CS+) and another was not (CS-). On Day 2, one CS+ and the CS- were presented without shock (Context B) for fear extinction learning. On Day 3, extinction recall (Context B) and renewal (Context A) were tested, with all stimuli presented without shock. Fear responses were assessed by skin conductance responses (SCR) and self-reported shock anticipation. Stress-exposed participants showed lower SCR during fear acquisition than controls. During extinction learning, control men exhibited greater SCR reduction than stressed men, whereas LF women showed the opposite pattern. No group differences emerged during extinction recall. During renewal, stressed LF women had lower SCR to the CS+ than their control counterparts. Additional analyses suggested that stressed men with lower cortisol reactivity had higher SCR during fear acquisition and renewal than those with higher cortisol reactivity. These findings indicate that stress exposure and cortisol reactivity differentially influence fear learning and regulation across sex and menstrual-cycle groups, in a context-dependent manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2025.107719
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of pre-acquisition stress on fear learning and regulation as a function of sex and menstrual-cycle groups

Marie‐France Marin, Jessie Provencher, Marie-Charlotte Beaulieu, Clémence Peyrot
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Stress Responses and Cortisol
article

Influence of pre-acquisition stress on fear learning and regulation as a function of sex and menstrual-cycle groups

Marie‐France Marin, Jessie Provencher, Marie-Charlotte Beaulieu, Clémence Peyrot
article en

Abstract

Fear conditioning protocols are widely used to investigate fear learning and regulation, with clinical implications for post-traumatic stress and anxiety disorders. In real-world settings, fear learning often occurs under stress, affecting memory strength and regulation. However, laboratory findings on stress effects remain inconsistent, possibly due to the lack of consideration for sex and menstrual-cycle groups, given sex hormones receptors' abundance in fear- and stress-related brain regions. This study examined the impact of 1) pre-acquisition stress and 2) cortisol reactivity on fear processes across sex and menstrual-cycle groups (hormonal data unavailable). A total of 208 participants were exposed to a stressor (men (n = 24), women using oral contraceptives (OCs; n = 25), and women with a menstrual cycle in the early follicular (EF; n = 24) or late follicular phase (LF; n = 26)) or control condition (men (n = 29), OCs (n = 23), EF (n = 26), LF (n = 31)) before undergoing fear acquisition (Context A), where two colors were paired with shock (CS+) and another was not (CS-). On Day 2, one CS+ and the CS- were presented without shock (Context B) for fear extinction learning. On Day 3, extinction recall (Context B) and renewal (Context A) were tested, with all stimuli presented without shock. Fear responses were assessed by skin conductance responses (SCR) and self-reported shock anticipation. Stress-exposed participants showed lower SCR during fear acquisition than controls. During extinction learning, control men exhibited greater SCR reduction than stressed men, whereas LF women showed the opposite pattern. No group differences emerged during extinction recall. During renewal, stressed LF women had lower SCR to the CS+ than their control counterparts. Additional analyses suggested that stressed men with lower cortisol reactivity had higher SCR during fear acquisition and renewal than those with higher cortisol reactivity. These findings indicate that stress exposure and cortisol reactivity differentially influence fear learning and regulation across sex and menstrual-cycle groups, in a context-dependent manner.

PsychoneuroendocrinologyVol. 185
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.