Global–local processing and the Ebbinghaus illusion: Group and individual differences in young and older adults

The Ebbinghaus illusion is a size illusion, in which a central circle appears larger or smaller depending on the size of surrounding circles. This illusion is widely used to study group-level differences in attentional processing, with the proposal that a local-processing bias reduces susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion. One hundred and forty-five participants (87 young; 58 older) were included in the analyses. Participants completed the Navon hierarchical-figures task, to measure the global-local processing bias, and the Ebbinghaus illusion task, to measure susceptibility to the illusion. First, we investigated whether a strong local-processing bias reduced susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion. Our findings did not support this proposal. At the group level, older participants demonstrated worse performance for global processing compared to young participants, but there were no age-group differences in susceptibility to the illusion. At the individual level, the young and older participants with the stronger local-processing bias were the participants with greater susceptibility to the illusion. Second, we investigated whether longer inspection times during the Ebbinghaus illusion task reduced susceptibility to the illusion. Our findings did support this proposal. At the group level, there were no age-group differences in either inspection time or susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion. At the individual level, we replicated previous findings-the participants with the longer inspection times were the participants with the least susceptibility to the illusion. We discuss alternative cognitive mechanisms that may account for the Ebbinghaus illusion and their relevance to age-related changes and individual differences in visual attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perception
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066251395949
Primary Topic
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global–local processing and the Ebbinghaus illusion: Group and individual differences in young and older adults

Haiwen Chen, Anne M. Aimola Davies
Perception
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
article

Global–local processing and the Ebbinghaus illusion: Group and individual differences in young and older adults

Haiwen Chen, Anne M. Aimola Davies
article en

Abstract

The Ebbinghaus illusion is a size illusion, in which a central circle appears larger or smaller depending on the size of surrounding circles. This illusion is widely used to study group-level differences in attentional processing, with the proposal that a local-processing bias reduces susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion. One hundred and forty-five participants (87 young; 58 older) were included in the analyses. Participants completed the Navon hierarchical-figures task, to measure the global-local processing bias, and the Ebbinghaus illusion task, to measure susceptibility to the illusion. First, we investigated whether a strong local-processing bias reduced susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion. Our findings did not support this proposal. At the group level, older participants demonstrated worse performance for global processing compared to young participants, but there were no age-group differences in susceptibility to the illusion. At the individual level, the young and older participants with the stronger local-processing bias were the participants with greater susceptibility to the illusion. Second, we investigated whether longer inspection times during the Ebbinghaus illusion task reduced susceptibility to the illusion. Our findings did support this proposal. At the group level, there were no age-group differences in either inspection time or susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus illusion. At the individual level, we replicated previous findings-the participants with the longer inspection times were the participants with the least susceptibility to the illusion. We discuss alternative cognitive mechanisms that may account for the Ebbinghaus illusion and their relevance to age-related changes and individual differences in visual attention.

Perception
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.