Impact of <sup>18</sup> F-FDG Vials on Well Counter Background Radiation: Evaluating Shielding and Distance Effects

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG, widely used in PET imaging, produces high-energy 511-keV annihilation photons that pose radiation exposure risks in radiopharmaceutical preparation and handling areas, or hot labs. Understanding how environmental factors influence background radiation in hot labs is essential for maintaining a safe workflow and ensuring accurate instrument readings. This study aims to evaluate the impact of shielding and distance on background radiation levels detected by a well counter in the presence of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG vials. Eight <sup>18</sup>F-FDG vials were measured in a specific sequence under 7 conditions. First, a background measurement was taken with no vial present. This was followed by measurements with the vials placed at distances of 1, 2, and 3 m from the detector, each tested both with and without the standard tungsten shielding. Count rates (counts per minute [cpm]) were recorded and analyzed for each condition. Unshielded <sup>18</sup>F-FDG values (21,157 cpm at 1 m, 2,166.4 cpm at 2 m, and 1,582.9 cpm at 3 m) were significantly higher than those for shielded <sup>18</sup>F-FDG at all distances (529.4, 243.5, and 229.4 cpm at 1, 2, and 3 m, respectively). Shielding reduced radiation exposure by up to 97.5% at 1 m. Shielded values at 3 m approached background levels (201.0 cpm), demonstrating the compounded effectiveness of distance and shielding. Both distance and shielding reduced radiation exposure from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG sources, with the greatest shielding benefit observed at closer distances. These findings emphasize the importance of spatial and protective strategies in hot lab environments to safeguard technologists, maintain regulatory compliance, and ensure precise measurements from radiation detection instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.125.270853
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of 18 F-FDG Vials on Well Counter Background Radiation: Evaluating Shielding and Distance Effects

Clément Royer, David Gilmore
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Impact of 18 F-FDG Vials on Well Counter Background Radiation: Evaluating Shielding and Distance Effects

Clément Royer, David Gilmore
article en

Abstract

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG, widely used in PET imaging, produces high-energy 511-keV annihilation photons that pose radiation exposure risks in radiopharmaceutical preparation and handling areas, or hot labs. Understanding how environmental factors influence background radiation in hot labs is essential for maintaining a safe workflow and ensuring accurate instrument readings. This study aims to evaluate the impact of shielding and distance on background radiation levels detected by a well counter in the presence of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG vials. Eight <sup>18</sup>F-FDG vials were measured in a specific sequence under 7 conditions. First, a background measurement was taken with no vial present. This was followed by measurements with the vials placed at distances of 1, 2, and 3 m from the detector, each tested both with and without the standard tungsten shielding. Count rates (counts per minute [cpm]) were recorded and analyzed for each condition. Unshielded <sup>18</sup>F-FDG values (21,157 cpm at 1 m, 2,166.4 cpm at 2 m, and 1,582.9 cpm at 3 m) were significantly higher than those for shielded <sup>18</sup>F-FDG at all distances (529.4, 243.5, and 229.4 cpm at 1, 2, and 3 m, respectively). Shielding reduced radiation exposure by up to 97.5% at 1 m. Shielded values at 3 m approached background levels (201.0 cpm), demonstrating the compounded effectiveness of distance and shielding. Both distance and shielding reduced radiation exposure from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG sources, with the greatest shielding benefit observed at closer distances. These findings emphasize the importance of spatial and protective strategies in hot lab environments to safeguard technologists, maintain regulatory compliance, and ensure precise measurements from radiation detection instruments.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine TechnologyVol. 54(1)
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of <sup>18</sup> F-FDG Vials on Well Counter Background Radiation: Evaluating Shielding and Distance Effects — Clément Royer, David Gilmore · Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS