Incentives as Strategic Instruments: Aligning CEO Compensation With Business Strategy

CEO compensation is not merely a governance mechanism; it is a strategic lever that shapes executive behavior and aligns managerial action with corporate objectives. This article develops a comprehensive conceptual framework that integrates agency theory, the resource-based view, and behavioral strategy to explain how diverse compensation structures support distinct competitive strategies: differentiation, cost leadership, and hybrid approaches. Through real-world illustrations, we demonstrate how equity-based incentives foster innovation, cash-based pay reinforces operational efficiency, and hybrid models balance both. We highlight the dangers of misaligned incentives—such as the Wells Fargo and Enron scandals—and emphasize the moderating roles of board independence, CEO duality, and ESG integration. Strategic compensation design demands multi-metric evaluation, dynamic adaptation, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. By positioning CEO pay as a forward-looking strategic instrument, this article offers boards, investors, and policymakers a roadmap for enhancing strategic coherence, long-term value creation, and responsible corporate leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Compensation & Benefits Review
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08863687251408912
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentives as Strategic Instruments: Aligning CEO Compensation With Business Strategy

Chandra S. Mishra
Compensation & Benefits Review
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Incentives as Strategic Instruments: Aligning CEO Compensation With Business Strategy

Chandra S. Mishra
article en

Abstract

CEO compensation is not merely a governance mechanism; it is a strategic lever that shapes executive behavior and aligns managerial action with corporate objectives. This article develops a comprehensive conceptual framework that integrates agency theory, the resource-based view, and behavioral strategy to explain how diverse compensation structures support distinct competitive strategies: differentiation, cost leadership, and hybrid approaches. Through real-world illustrations, we demonstrate how equity-based incentives foster innovation, cash-based pay reinforces operational efficiency, and hybrid models balance both. We highlight the dangers of misaligned incentives—such as the Wells Fargo and Enron scandals—and emphasize the moderating roles of board independence, CEO duality, and ESG integration. Strategic compensation design demands multi-metric evaluation, dynamic adaptation, and inclusive stakeholder engagement. By positioning CEO pay as a forward-looking strategic instrument, this article offers boards, investors, and policymakers a roadmap for enhancing strategic coherence, long-term value creation, and responsible corporate leadership.

Compensation & Benefits ReviewVol. 58(2)
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incentives as Strategic Instruments: Aligning CEO Compensation With Business Strategy — Chandra S. Mishra · Compensation & Benefits Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS