Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Intertemporal Hedging and Transaction Costs

When returns are partially predictable and trading is costly, utility-maximizing investors track a target portfolio at a constant trading speed. The target portfolio is optimal for a frictionless market, where asset returns are scaled back to account for trading costs and volatilities are adjusted to proxy the “execution risk” of holding assets that are costly to trade and exposed to volatile states. The trading speed solves an optimal execution problem, which describes how the legacy portfolio inherited from the past is traded toward the target portfolio in an optimal manner. Unlike for period-by-period mean-variance preferences, the target portfolio hedges changes in investment opportunities, and both it and the trading speed are linked and depend on execution risk. We set the problem out first in an “absolute” framework—price shocks independent of the price level, and investors have CARA preferences—and then in a “relative” framework, with price shocks scaled by price levels and CRRA preferences. We illustrate the practical implications of these results in a model where market return predictions are based on a short-term momentum and a long-term value signal. This paper was accepted by Kay Giesecke, finance. Funding: X. Shi acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through Discovery [Grant RGPIN-2024-04569] and Discovery Launch Supplement [DGECR-2024-00444]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05913 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05913
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Intertemporal Hedging and Transaction Costs

Johannes Muhle‐Karbe, James Sefton, Xiaofei Shi
1 citations
Management Science
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
article

Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Intertemporal Hedging and Transaction Costs

Johannes Muhle‐Karbe, James Sefton, Xiaofei Shi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

When returns are partially predictable and trading is costly, utility-maximizing investors track a target portfolio at a constant trading speed. The target portfolio is optimal for a frictionless market, where asset returns are scaled back to account for trading costs and volatilities are adjusted to proxy the “execution risk” of holding assets that are costly to trade and exposed to volatile states. The trading speed solves an optimal execution problem, which describes how the legacy portfolio inherited from the past is traded toward the target portfolio in an optimal manner. Unlike for period-by-period mean-variance preferences, the target portfolio hedges changes in investment opportunities, and both it and the trading speed are linked and depend on execution risk. We set the problem out first in an “absolute” framework—price shocks independent of the price level, and investors have CARA preferences—and then in a “relative” framework, with price shocks scaled by price levels and CRRA preferences. We illustrate the practical implications of these results in a model where market return predictions are based on a short-term momentum and a long-term value signal. This paper was accepted by Kay Giesecke, finance. Funding: X. Shi acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through Discovery [Grant RGPIN-2024-04569] and Discovery Launch Supplement [DGECR-2024-00444]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.05913 .

Management Science
University of Toronto (CA), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.