Developing vaccines against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep – the model matters

Different parasite challenge models have been used over many years in the development of novel vaccines against gastrointestinal nematodes of livestock. Typically, following vaccination with either native or recombinant proteins, the host animal is then given a bolus challenge of infective nematode larvae (iL3) or a trickle challenge where smaller numbers of iL3 are given at regular intervals over a period of time. The bolus method may be a robust test of whether high levels of vaccine-induced immunity translate to protection against a large pathogen insult, whereas the trickle infection method may be more appropriate to test the impacts of an exposure-induced anamnestic response. In the work presented here, three different models of testing gastrointestinal nematode vaccine efficacy were compared. Lambs (4-5 months old) were vaccinated with the excretory/secretory products collected from ex-vivo Teladorsagia circumcincta fourth stage larvae (L4ESP) and then challenged with a bolus of 5,000 iL3 or with a trickle infection where 2,000 iL3 were administered 3 times per week for 4 weeks (truncated trickle) or continuously challenged for 9 weeks (trickle) until post-mortem. Monitoring of faecal egg counts following challenge demonstrated that there was no significant impact of vaccination on cumulative faecal egg count (cFEC) following bolus challenge but, during the period of regular ingestion of iL3 in both trickle challenge models, statistically-significant reductions in the cFEC [(40-46 % reduction in mean cFEC (P < 0.05); 68-71 % reduction in median cFEC)] were observed. Shortly after cessation of the iL3 challenge in the truncated trickle challenge group, this protective effect of the vaccine on cFEC was lost whereas vaccine efficacy was maintained in the model with continued regular ingestion of iL3 (trickle challenge model, which most accurately reflect the parasite challenge in a field situation). In conclusion, the choice of challenge model had a profound impact on the ability to measure vaccine efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Parasitology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2025.12.003
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Helminth infection and control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing vaccines against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep – the model matters

Tom N. McNeilly, Yvonne Bartley, David A. Ewing, William D. Smith et al.
1 citations
International Journal for Parasitology
Helminth infection and control
2.35
article

Developing vaccines against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep – the model matters

Tom N. McNeilly, Yvonne Bartley, David A. Ewing, William D. Smith, Alasdair J. Nisbet, Margaret A. Oliver, Daniel R. G. Price, Philip Steele, I. V. Hunt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Different parasite challenge models have been used over many years in the development of novel vaccines against gastrointestinal nematodes of livestock. Typically, following vaccination with either native or recombinant proteins, the host animal is then given a bolus challenge of infective nematode larvae (iL3) or a trickle challenge where smaller numbers of iL3 are given at regular intervals over a period of time. The bolus method may be a robust test of whether high levels of vaccine-induced immunity translate to protection against a large pathogen insult, whereas the trickle infection method may be more appropriate to test the impacts of an exposure-induced anamnestic response. In the work presented here, three different models of testing gastrointestinal nematode vaccine efficacy were compared. Lambs (4-5 months old) were vaccinated with the excretory/secretory products collected from ex-vivo Teladorsagia circumcincta fourth stage larvae (L4ESP) and then challenged with a bolus of 5,000 iL3 or with a trickle infection where 2,000 iL3 were administered 3 times per week for 4 weeks (truncated trickle) or continuously challenged for 9 weeks (trickle) until post-mortem. Monitoring of faecal egg counts following challenge demonstrated that there was no significant impact of vaccination on cumulative faecal egg count (cFEC) following bolus challenge but, during the period of regular ingestion of iL3 in both trickle challenge models, statistically-significant reductions in the cFEC [(40-46 % reduction in mean cFEC (P < 0.05); 68-71 % reduction in median cFEC)] were observed. Shortly after cessation of the iL3 challenge in the truncated trickle challenge group, this protective effect of the vaccine on cFEC was lost whereas vaccine efficacy was maintained in the model with continued regular ingestion of iL3 (trickle challenge model, which most accurately reflect the parasite challenge in a field situation). In conclusion, the choice of challenge model had a profound impact on the ability to measure vaccine efficacy.

International Journal for Parasitology
Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland (GB), Moredun Research Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Helminth infection and control
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.