Development and implementation of standardized study enrollment metrics for a VA healthcare system clinical research consortium: A 6-year follow-up assessment

Participant enrollment remains a leading indicator of the validity and generalizability of clinical trial results in the population at large. Establishing standardized and structured enrollment metrics can offer valuable information on clinical research performance (site and network level). The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES) evaluated its performance against standardized study and network enrollment metrics over a 6-year timeframe from implementation of the metrics (VA Fiscal Year (FY) 2019) through FY 2024. Our findings demonstrate a positive trend in the ability of network sites to achieve NODES-specific enrollment metrics, comparing FY 2019 (55 %) to FY 2024 (73 %). Additionally, we identified improvement in study participant enrollment more broadly based on CSP study-specific enrollment metrics, as evidenced by an increase in the percentage that Node sites achieved ≥50 % of their expected enrollment targets in FY 2019 (64.7 %) on average compared to FY 2024 (69.5 %), and sustained performance as it relates to the percentage that network sites were in the "Top 1/3 of Study Sites Overall" comparing FY 2019 (36.9 %) to FY 2024 (36.1 %). Lastly, CSP Node sites enrolled study participants at a higher percentage than non-Node CSP study sites when comparing enrollment (actual/expected) by margins of 28.4 % (FY 2019) and 21.6 % (FY 2024), respectively. It is our hope that our experiences of navigating challenges associated with this effort, understanding lessons learned, and achieving successes might serve as a useful template for other clinical research consortiums that aim to evaluate their performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2025.108175
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and implementation of standardized study enrollment metrics for a VA healthcare system clinical research consortium: A 6-year follow-up assessment

Grant D. Huang, Danielle Beck, Merritt H. Raitt, Marcus R. Johnson et al.
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Development and implementation of standardized study enrollment metrics for a VA healthcare system clinical research consortium: A 6-year follow-up assessment

Grant D. Huang, Danielle Beck, Merritt H. Raitt, Marcus R. Johnson, Aliya Asghar
article en

Abstract

Participant enrollment remains a leading indicator of the validity and generalizability of clinical trial results in the population at large. Establishing standardized and structured enrollment metrics can offer valuable information on clinical research performance (site and network level). The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) Network of Dedicated Enrollment Sites (NODES) evaluated its performance against standardized study and network enrollment metrics over a 6-year timeframe from implementation of the metrics (VA Fiscal Year (FY) 2019) through FY 2024. Our findings demonstrate a positive trend in the ability of network sites to achieve NODES-specific enrollment metrics, comparing FY 2019 (55 %) to FY 2024 (73 %). Additionally, we identified improvement in study participant enrollment more broadly based on CSP study-specific enrollment metrics, as evidenced by an increase in the percentage that Node sites achieved ≥50 % of their expected enrollment targets in FY 2019 (64.7 %) on average compared to FY 2024 (69.5 %), and sustained performance as it relates to the percentage that network sites were in the "Top 1/3 of Study Sites Overall" comparing FY 2019 (36.9 %) to FY 2024 (36.1 %). Lastly, CSP Node sites enrolled study participants at a higher percentage than non-Node CSP study sites when comparing enrollment (actual/expected) by margins of 28.4 % (FY 2019) and 21.6 % (FY 2024), respectively. It is our hope that our experiences of navigating challenges associated with this effort, understanding lessons learned, and achieving successes might serve as a useful template for other clinical research consortiums that aim to evaluate their performance.

Contemporary Clinical TrialsVol. 160
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), VA San Diego Healthcare System (US), VA Portland Health Care System (US), VA Long Beach Healthcare System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.