S1517 Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Ozanimod in Anti-TNF Naïve Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-World Matched Cohort Study

Introduction: Ustekinumab and ozanimod are approved for the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, real-world data comparing their effectiveness in anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) naïve patients remains scarce. This study aimed to compare the 1-year clinical outcomes of ustekinumab vs ozanimod in anti-TNF naïve UC patients using a large real-world database. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Research Network to compare the 1-year outcomes of anti-TNF naïve adult patients with UC who initiated ustekinumab or ozanimod between January 2021 and April 2024. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching (PSM) for demographics, comorbidities, and baseline laboratory parameters. The primary outcome was corticosteroid use at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included rates of surgery, inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and subsequent anti-TNF initiation. Results: A total of 1,926 patients with ulcerative colitis were identified, including 307 who initiated ozanimod (2021-2024). After matching, 306 patients were included in each treatment arm. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups (mean age: 42 ± 17 vs 42 ± 16 years; women: 37% vs 40%; P > 0.05 across all clinical variables). At 1 year, corticosteroid use was similar between ustekinumab and ozanimod (39.5% vs 40.9%; aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.81–1.53; P = 0.70). There were no significant differences in surgical intervention (3.6% vs 3.3%; aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.42–2.30; P = 0.60), inpatient hospitalizations (3.2% vs 3.3%; aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.42–2.30; P = 0.90), or emergency department (ED) visits (10.8% vs 10.5%; aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.62–1.73; P = 0.80). A trend toward reduced anti-TNF initiation was observed in the ustekinumab group (3.3% vs 6.2%; aOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 0.89–4.29; P = 0.10). Conclusion: Our real-world study showed that among anti-TNF naïve UC patients, ustekinumab and ozanimod demonstrated comparable 1-year effectiveness with similar corticosteroid use and healthcare utilization outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to understand long-term outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133528.20899.e0
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1517 Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Ozanimod in Anti-TNF Naïve Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-World Matched Cohort Study

Khaled Elfert, Ahmed Salem, Mohamed Eldesouki, Hazem Abosheaishaa et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1517 Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Ozanimod in Anti-TNF Naïve Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-World Matched Cohort Study

Khaled Elfert, Ahmed Salem, Mohamed Eldesouki, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Ismail Althunibat, Jennifer Hadam-Veverka, Ahmed M. S. Ibrahim, Murad Qirem, Yahya Alhalalmeh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Ustekinumab and ozanimod are approved for the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, real-world data comparing their effectiveness in anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) naïve patients remains scarce. This study aimed to compare the 1-year clinical outcomes of ustekinumab vs ozanimod in anti-TNF naïve UC patients using a large real-world database. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Research Network to compare the 1-year outcomes of anti-TNF naïve adult patients with UC who initiated ustekinumab or ozanimod between January 2021 and April 2024. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score matching (PSM) for demographics, comorbidities, and baseline laboratory parameters. The primary outcome was corticosteroid use at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included rates of surgery, inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and subsequent anti-TNF initiation. Results: A total of 1,926 patients with ulcerative colitis were identified, including 307 who initiated ozanimod (2021-2024). After matching, 306 patients were included in each treatment arm. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups (mean age: 42 ± 17 vs 42 ± 16 years; women: 37% vs 40%; P > 0.05 across all clinical variables). At 1 year, corticosteroid use was similar between ustekinumab and ozanimod (39.5% vs 40.9%; aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.81–1.53; P = 0.70). There were no significant differences in surgical intervention (3.6% vs 3.3%; aOR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.42–2.30; P = 0.60), inpatient hospitalizations (3.2% vs 3.3%; aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.42–2.30; P = 0.90), or emergency department (ED) visits (10.8% vs 10.5%; aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.62–1.73; P = 0.80). A trend toward reduced anti-TNF initiation was observed in the ustekinumab group (3.3% vs 6.2%; aOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 0.89–4.29; P = 0.10). Conclusion: Our real-world study showed that among anti-TNF naïve UC patients, ustekinumab and ozanimod demonstrated comparable 1-year effectiveness with similar corticosteroid use and healthcare utilization outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to understand long-term outcomes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.