S1539 Safety of Combination Biologic and/or Small Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single-Center Analysis

Introduction: Despite an increasing variety of treatment options, many inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients do not achieve therapy goals. Many require hospitalization and high-risk interventions, such as steroids or surgery. This study evaluates the safety of combination regimens including newer agents in adult IBD patients. Methods: Adult patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) treated ≥6 weeks with 2 concomitant biologic and/or small molecule therapies (including TNF antagonists [TNF-a], anti-integrin agents, IL-(12/)23 inhibitors [IL-12/23i], JAK inhibitors [JAKi], or S1P receptor modulators) were identified via clinical practice and an institutional IBD patient database. Data were obtained on demographics, treatment, and safety outcomes. For patients who received >1 combination, the first combination was used for demographics. Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables. Results: 125 regimens among 102 patients (64 CD, 38 UC) were analyzed with 49% women, 9% Black, and 11% Hispanic; mean age was 40 ± 17 years. Average disease duration by combination start was 14 ± 12 years. 92% received prior steroids and 88% prior TNF-a. 72% failed ≥2 advanced therapies, and 56% of CD patients had prior surgery. Mean combination duration was 12.1 ±12.7 months. Of the 62 that were discontinued, 13 (21%) were due to adverse events. Eleven percent of combinations involved IBD surgery during or ≤12 weeks post-cessation. Overall rates of infection and IBD-related hospitalization were 31% and 13%, respectively. There was one case each (1%) of herpes zoster, C. Difficile infection, and a thrombotic event. At the time of combination start, 41 regimens (33%) included baseline steroid treatment. Compared to no steroids at baseline, regimens with baseline steroid use were associated with significantly greater rates of infection (44% vs 24%, P = 0.02), infection requiring antibiotics (41% vs 17%, P = 0.003), and infection requiring hospitalization (7% vs 0%, P = 0.01), with numerically higher rates of any IBD-related hospitalization (15% vs 4.8%, P = 0.056). Conclusion: In a large specialty IBD center, combination therapy was generally feasible with an acceptable safety profile among patients with severe, treatment-refractory disease. Baseline treatment with steroids at combination initiation was associated with a >2× higher rate of serious infection and >3× higher rate of IBD-related hospitalization, though the latter did not reach statistical significance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133616.89033.c8
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1539 Safety of Combination Biologic and/or Small Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single-Center Analysis

Michael Mintz, Ellen Scherl, Randy Longman, Caroline Young et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1539 Safety of Combination Biologic and/or Small Molecule Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single-Center Analysis

Michael Mintz, Ellen Scherl, Randy Longman, Caroline Young, Anjile An, Laura Sahyoun, Dana J. Lukin, Jacob K. Jamison, Vinita Jacob
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Despite an increasing variety of treatment options, many inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients do not achieve therapy goals. Many require hospitalization and high-risk interventions, such as steroids or surgery. This study evaluates the safety of combination regimens including newer agents in adult IBD patients. Methods: Adult patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) treated ≥6 weeks with 2 concomitant biologic and/or small molecule therapies (including TNF antagonists [TNF-a], anti-integrin agents, IL-(12/)23 inhibitors [IL-12/23i], JAK inhibitors [JAKi], or S1P receptor modulators) were identified via clinical practice and an institutional IBD patient database. Data were obtained on demographics, treatment, and safety outcomes. For patients who received >1 combination, the first combination was used for demographics. Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables. Results: 125 regimens among 102 patients (64 CD, 38 UC) were analyzed with 49% women, 9% Black, and 11% Hispanic; mean age was 40 ± 17 years. Average disease duration by combination start was 14 ± 12 years. 92% received prior steroids and 88% prior TNF-a. 72% failed ≥2 advanced therapies, and 56% of CD patients had prior surgery. Mean combination duration was 12.1 ±12.7 months. Of the 62 that were discontinued, 13 (21%) were due to adverse events. Eleven percent of combinations involved IBD surgery during or ≤12 weeks post-cessation. Overall rates of infection and IBD-related hospitalization were 31% and 13%, respectively. There was one case each (1%) of herpes zoster, C. Difficile infection, and a thrombotic event. At the time of combination start, 41 regimens (33%) included baseline steroid treatment. Compared to no steroids at baseline, regimens with baseline steroid use were associated with significantly greater rates of infection (44% vs 24%, P = 0.02), infection requiring antibiotics (41% vs 17%, P = 0.003), and infection requiring hospitalization (7% vs 0%, P = 0.01), with numerically higher rates of any IBD-related hospitalization (15% vs 4.8%, P = 0.056). Conclusion: In a large specialty IBD center, combination therapy was generally feasible with an acceptable safety profile among patients with severe, treatment-refractory disease. Baseline treatment with steroids at combination initiation was associated with a >2× higher rate of serious infection and >3× higher rate of IBD-related hospitalization, though the latter did not reach statistical significance.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.