S1394 Outcomes of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding at Teaching vs Non-Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

Introduction: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common and potentially serious cause of hospitalization, often requiring endoscopic or radiologic intervention. Outcomes may vary by hospital type, with teaching hospitals typically managing more complex cases. However, the impact of teaching status on LGIB outcomes remains unclear. Understanding these differences is essential to improving care delivery and reducing outcome disparities. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2018–2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify adult hospitalizations for LGIB. Hospitals were classified as teaching (urban teaching) or non-teaching (urban non-teaching and rural). Survey-weighted multivariable regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Secondary outcomes included colonoscopy, early colonoscopy (≤1 day), angiography, embolization, and transfusion. Results: Among an estimated 501,120 weighted LGIB admissions, 72.3% occurred at teaching hospitals. Compared to non-teaching hospitals, teaching hospitals had more non-White patients, higher comorbidity burden (Charlson index ≥3), and greater Medicaid enrollment. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 0.94%, and significantly higher at teaching hospitals (0.99%) than non-teaching (0.82%, P = 0.013). After adjustment, teaching hospital admission was associated with 25% increased odds of mortality (aOR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07–1.47, P = 0.006), longer LOS (+0.56 days, P < 0.001), and higher total hospital charges (+$6,399, P < 0.001). Teaching hospitals had higher adjusted odds of colonoscopy, angiography, and embolization. Early colonoscopy rates did not differ. Conclusion: In this nationally representative analysis of LGIB hospitalizations, admission to teaching hospitals was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, prolonged LOS, and increased healthcare costs, likely due to more frequent use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. These differences may reflect the referral of more complex or acutely ill patients to teaching centers. The lack of difference in early colonoscopy rates suggests that factors beyond timing of intervention may contribute to outcome disparities. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the role of hospital-level factors in shaping LGIB outcomes and to identify opportunities for improving care across all hospital settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133036.02602.89
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1394 Outcomes of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding at Teaching vs Non-Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

James C. Lee, Daniel S. Jamorabo, Lisa Fisher, Matthew B. Obusan et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1394 Outcomes of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding at Teaching vs Non-Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

James C. Lee, Daniel S. Jamorabo, Lisa Fisher, Matthew B. Obusan, Alan Abboud, Rahul Tripathi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common and potentially serious cause of hospitalization, often requiring endoscopic or radiologic intervention. Outcomes may vary by hospital type, with teaching hospitals typically managing more complex cases. However, the impact of teaching status on LGIB outcomes remains unclear. Understanding these differences is essential to improving care delivery and reducing outcome disparities. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the 2018–2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify adult hospitalizations for LGIB. Hospitals were classified as teaching (urban teaching) or non-teaching (urban non-teaching and rural). Survey-weighted multivariable regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Secondary outcomes included colonoscopy, early colonoscopy (≤1 day), angiography, embolization, and transfusion. Results: Among an estimated 501,120 weighted LGIB admissions, 72.3% occurred at teaching hospitals. Compared to non-teaching hospitals, teaching hospitals had more non-White patients, higher comorbidity burden (Charlson index ≥3), and greater Medicaid enrollment. Overall, in-hospital mortality was 0.94%, and significantly higher at teaching hospitals (0.99%) than non-teaching (0.82%, P = 0.013). After adjustment, teaching hospital admission was associated with 25% increased odds of mortality (aOR 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07–1.47, P = 0.006), longer LOS (+0.56 days, P < 0.001), and higher total hospital charges (+$6,399, P < 0.001). Teaching hospitals had higher adjusted odds of colonoscopy, angiography, and embolization. Early colonoscopy rates did not differ. Conclusion: In this nationally representative analysis of LGIB hospitalizations, admission to teaching hospitals was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, prolonged LOS, and increased healthcare costs, likely due to more frequent use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. These differences may reflect the referral of more complex or acutely ill patients to teaching centers. The lack of difference in early colonoscopy rates suggests that factors beyond timing of intervention may contribute to outcome disparities. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the role of hospital-level factors in shaping LGIB outcomes and to identify opportunities for improving care across all hospital settings.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.