S1398 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia After a Severe Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage From Different Types of Gastrointestinal Lesions

Introduction: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is often underrecognized in patients after a severe gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (GIH). For patients with severe GIH, our aims were to compare rates of diagnosis and treatment of IDA and clinical outcomes of 3 subgroups of GIH: portal hypertension (PH) lesions (varices and PH gastropathy), acute on chronic anemia (ACA) from angioma syndromes, or IDA with acute GIH from focal lesions with arteries. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients hospitalized with severe GIH. Severe GIH was defined as acute GIH with drop of Hb ≥2 g/dL or 1 unit of packed red blood cell transfusion. IDA was defined as serum iron <50 mcg/dL, ferritin <30 ng/mL, and transferrin saturation <20%. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes. P-value < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results: There were significant differences in age, gender, race. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) were significantly more prevalent in the ACA group and liver diseases more common in the variceal/PHG group. Rates of testing for IDA ranged from 42% to 59% For those tested, documented IDA prevalence was high, ranging from 72.2% to 84.6%. There were significant differences in the rates of iron treatment in the 3 groups: 59% in ACA, 36% in acute severe GIH, and 19% in variceal/PHG group For adjusted analysis using the acute severe GIH as reference group, the odds of iron treatment were lower in the variceal/PHG group (OR 0.25, P = 0.001) but higher in the ACA group (OR 2.44, P = 0.046). Both the number of severe clinical outcomes and the composite outcome score were significantly lower in the acute severe GIH group indicating better results than the other 2 subgroups. Conclusion: 1) 84.6% of patients with ACA had IDA and most received iron treatment but still had poor outcomes, 2) Patients with varices/PHG hemorrhage had the lowest rates of iron testing and treatment. 3) 51% of patients with acute severe GIH were tested for and 72.2% had IDA, 36% received iron, and they had the best clinical outcomes. 4) Further interventional studies should focus on diagnosis of IDA and treatment of IDA patients with acute severe GIH from focal lesions with arteries because they are most likely to benefit and not the other 2 subgroups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133052.18848.5d
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1398 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia After a Severe Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage From Different Types of Gastrointestinal Lesions

Mary Ellen Jensen, Peerapol Wangrattanapranee, Dennis M. Jensen, Usah Dutson
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1398 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia After a Severe Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage From Different Types of Gastrointestinal Lesions

Mary Ellen Jensen, Peerapol Wangrattanapranee, Dennis M. Jensen, Usah Dutson
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is often underrecognized in patients after a severe gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (GIH). For patients with severe GIH, our aims were to compare rates of diagnosis and treatment of IDA and clinical outcomes of 3 subgroups of GIH: portal hypertension (PH) lesions (varices and PH gastropathy), acute on chronic anemia (ACA) from angioma syndromes, or IDA with acute GIH from focal lesions with arteries. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients hospitalized with severe GIH. Severe GIH was defined as acute GIH with drop of Hb ≥2 g/dL or 1 unit of packed red blood cell transfusion. IDA was defined as serum iron <50 mcg/dL, ferritin <30 ng/mL, and transferrin saturation <20%. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes. P-value < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results: There were significant differences in age, gender, race. Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) were significantly more prevalent in the ACA group and liver diseases more common in the variceal/PHG group. Rates of testing for IDA ranged from 42% to 59% For those tested, documented IDA prevalence was high, ranging from 72.2% to 84.6%. There were significant differences in the rates of iron treatment in the 3 groups: 59% in ACA, 36% in acute severe GIH, and 19% in variceal/PHG group For adjusted analysis using the acute severe GIH as reference group, the odds of iron treatment were lower in the variceal/PHG group (OR 0.25, P = 0.001) but higher in the ACA group (OR 2.44, P = 0.046). Both the number of severe clinical outcomes and the composite outcome score were significantly lower in the acute severe GIH group indicating better results than the other 2 subgroups. Conclusion: 1) 84.6% of patients with ACA had IDA and most received iron treatment but still had poor outcomes, 2) Patients with varices/PHG hemorrhage had the lowest rates of iron testing and treatment. 3) 51% of patients with acute severe GIH were tested for and 72.2% had IDA, 36% received iron, and they had the best clinical outcomes. 4) Further interventional studies should focus on diagnosis of IDA and treatment of IDA patients with acute severe GIH from focal lesions with arteries because they are most likely to benefit and not the other 2 subgroups.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.