S1406 Impact of Heart Failure Type on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A National Analysis

Introduction: Gastrointestinal bleed (GIB), specifically nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (NVUGIB) and lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB), are common causes of hospitalizations and are associated with adverse outcomes. Studies have shown that patients with heart failure who are admitted for NVUGIB and LGIB are at increased risk of mortality. However, there is limited information on differences in outcomes between types of heart failure. Our study aims to compare outcomes and adverse events of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) admitted for GIB. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), we identified adult patients admitted for NVUGIB and/or LGIB using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Patients were stratified by the presence of either concomitant HFpEF or HFrEF. Multivariate regression using STATA 18 was utilized to analyze the difference in outcomes, adverse events, and resource utilization, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Results: A total of 302,639 patients admitted for NVUGIB or LGIB with concomitant heart failure were identified, of which 183,575 (60.66%) had HFpEF and 119,065 (39.34%) had HFrEF. HFpEF patients were generally older and more often woman than HFrEF patients, while a larger proportion of HFrEF patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores, indicating greater comorbidity burden. HFrEF patients had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.40, P < 0.001), ICU stay (aOR 1.26, P < 0.001), AKI (aOR 1.08, P < 0.001), shock (aOR 1.40, P < 0.001), cardiac arrest (aOR 1.49, P < 0.001), and need for blood transfusion (aOR 1.04, P = 0.048). There was no significant difference between groups in the likelihood of sepsis or VTE events. There was no statistically significant difference in LOS between groups; however, the HFrEF cohort had significantly higher mean hospitalization charges (+$2,017, P = 0.004). Conclusion: We found that patients with HFrEF admitted for NVUGIB or LGIB have significantly worse outcomes and greater healthcare utilization than patients with HFpEF. Further studies to understand the pathophysiologic basis of these differences could provide insight into tailored therapy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133084.21723.a1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1406 Impact of Heart Failure Type on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A National Analysis

Abhin Sapkota, Seema Gandhi, Denise Nunez, Alejandro Nieto Dominguez et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1406 Impact of Heart Failure Type on Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A National Analysis

Abhin Sapkota, Seema Gandhi, Denise Nunez, Alejandro Nieto Dominguez, Saksham Kohli, Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam, Gedion Yilma Amdetsion, Patricia Zarza Gulino, Daniel Guifarro Rivera, Maria Grba
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal bleed (GIB), specifically nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (NVUGIB) and lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB), are common causes of hospitalizations and are associated with adverse outcomes. Studies have shown that patients with heart failure who are admitted for NVUGIB and LGIB are at increased risk of mortality. However, there is limited information on differences in outcomes between types of heart failure. Our study aims to compare outcomes and adverse events of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) admitted for GIB. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), we identified adult patients admitted for NVUGIB and/or LGIB using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Patients were stratified by the presence of either concomitant HFpEF or HFrEF. Multivariate regression using STATA 18 was utilized to analyze the difference in outcomes, adverse events, and resource utilization, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Results: A total of 302,639 patients admitted for NVUGIB or LGIB with concomitant heart failure were identified, of which 183,575 (60.66%) had HFpEF and 119,065 (39.34%) had HFrEF. HFpEF patients were generally older and more often woman than HFrEF patients, while a larger proportion of HFrEF patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores, indicating greater comorbidity burden. HFrEF patients had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.40, P < 0.001), ICU stay (aOR 1.26, P < 0.001), AKI (aOR 1.08, P < 0.001), shock (aOR 1.40, P < 0.001), cardiac arrest (aOR 1.49, P < 0.001), and need for blood transfusion (aOR 1.04, P = 0.048). There was no significant difference between groups in the likelihood of sepsis or VTE events. There was no statistically significant difference in LOS between groups; however, the HFrEF cohort had significantly higher mean hospitalization charges (+$2,017, P = 0.004). Conclusion: We found that patients with HFrEF admitted for NVUGIB or LGIB have significantly worse outcomes and greater healthcare utilization than patients with HFpEF. Further studies to understand the pathophysiologic basis of these differences could provide insight into tailored therapy.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.