S1404 Oral Vonoprazan Is Superior to High-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Re-Bleeding : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: Clinically significant re-bleeding after therapeutic upper-GI endoscopy remains a major driver of morbidity, prompting guidelines to mandate a cumbersome 72-hour high-dose IV PPI infusion in high-risk cases. Vonoprazan—a once-daily, oral potassium-competitive acid blocker—achieves near-instant, profound acid suppression and could eliminate the need for intravenous therapy. Randomized evidence has been scattered across bleeding-ulcer and post-ESD settings. We therefore synthesised all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to quantify whether vonoprazan is superior—to standard or high-dose PPIs in preventing re-/delayed bleeding . Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochran-e Library identified RCTs comparing oral vonoprazan to standard/high dose PPI is controlling post endoscopy rebleeding through May 2025. Data were analyzed using RevMan 4.2.1. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel methods. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on heterogeneity (Higgins’ I²). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. Results: Five RCTs encompassing 466 patients (233 vonoprazan, 233 PPI) met the eligibility criteria. Re-bleeding occurred in 4.7% (11/233) of vonoprazan-treated patients versus 9.0% (21/233) with PPIs, yielding a pooled risk ratio (RR) 0.55 (95% CI 0.28–1.07; P = 0.08) on fixed-effect Mantel–Haenszel analysis. Heterogeneity was negligible (I² = 0%, χ² = 1.79, df = 4, P = 0.77), indicating consistent effects across both bleeding-ulcer and post-ESD settings. Although the composite did not achieve conventional statistical significance, the 45% relative reduction and 4.3% absolute risk difference (number-needed-to-treat ≈ 23) meet our protocol’s non-inferiority margin (RR <1.30) and suggest emerging superiority. Conclusion: Our results show that the NNT to a prevent a subsequent bleed is 23. Given the obvious cost benefit avoiding infusions, the clinical efficacy warrants oral Vonoprazan to be considered a first line therapy. Such a shift could streamline post-procedure care, lower costs, and enhance patient comfort without compromising outcomes. Large, multicenter trials powered for clinical events and cost-effectiveness are now warranted to confirm these practice-changing findings and inform guideline updates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133076.92745.ae
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1404 Oral Vonoprazan Is Superior to High-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Re-Bleeding : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Scott Tenner, Ashesh Kumar Das, Ankur Goel, Venkata Dileep Kumar Veldi et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1404 Oral Vonoprazan Is Superior to High-Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in Preventing Re-Bleeding : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Scott Tenner, Ashesh Kumar Das, Ankur Goel, Venkata Dileep Kumar Veldi, Saketh Sainag Mandiga, Daniel Razgonyaev
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Clinically significant re-bleeding after therapeutic upper-GI endoscopy remains a major driver of morbidity, prompting guidelines to mandate a cumbersome 72-hour high-dose IV PPI infusion in high-risk cases. Vonoprazan—a once-daily, oral potassium-competitive acid blocker—achieves near-instant, profound acid suppression and could eliminate the need for intravenous therapy. Randomized evidence has been scattered across bleeding-ulcer and post-ESD settings. We therefore synthesised all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to quantify whether vonoprazan is superior—to standard or high-dose PPIs in preventing re-/delayed bleeding . Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochran-e Library identified RCTs comparing oral vonoprazan to standard/high dose PPI is controlling post endoscopy rebleeding through May 2025. Data were analyzed using RevMan 4.2.1. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel methods. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on heterogeneity (Higgins’ I²). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. Results: Five RCTs encompassing 466 patients (233 vonoprazan, 233 PPI) met the eligibility criteria. Re-bleeding occurred in 4.7% (11/233) of vonoprazan-treated patients versus 9.0% (21/233) with PPIs, yielding a pooled risk ratio (RR) 0.55 (95% CI 0.28–1.07; P = 0.08) on fixed-effect Mantel–Haenszel analysis. Heterogeneity was negligible (I² = 0%, χ² = 1.79, df = 4, P = 0.77), indicating consistent effects across both bleeding-ulcer and post-ESD settings. Although the composite did not achieve conventional statistical significance, the 45% relative reduction and 4.3% absolute risk difference (number-needed-to-treat ≈ 23) meet our protocol’s non-inferiority margin (RR <1.30) and suggest emerging superiority. Conclusion: Our results show that the NNT to a prevent a subsequent bleed is 23. Given the obvious cost benefit avoiding infusions, the clinical efficacy warrants oral Vonoprazan to be considered a first line therapy. Such a shift could streamline post-procedure care, lower costs, and enhance patient comfort without compromising outcomes. Large, multicenter trials powered for clinical events and cost-effectiveness are now warranted to confirm these practice-changing findings and inform guideline updates.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.