S1410 Evaluating the Role of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Child-Pugh A/B Cirrhosis With Upper GI Bleeding: Insights From a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in cirrhosis patients presents a considerable risk of infectious complications and mortality. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is advocated to prevent infections; however, its efficacy in Child-Pugh (CP) class A and B patients remains uncertain. This study evaluated the impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis on outcomes of UGIB among cirrhotic CP class A/B patients with UGIB. Methods: Patients with CP class A/B cirrhosis hospitalized for UGIB at 2 Rochester Regional Health hospitals from January 2020 - March 2024 were enrolled retrospectively. Patients with CP class C cirrhosis and those with bacterial infections were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on antimicrobial prophylaxis receipt. Outcomes evaluated included infection incidence within 30 days, rebleeding during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Results: We included 150 cirrhotic patients (CP class A or B) admitted for UGIB, of whom 101 received antimicrobial prophylaxis, while 49 did not. Of patients who received antimicrobial prophylaxis, a higher proportion had variceal bleeding as the etiology for bleeding compared to those who did not receive antimicrobial prophylaxis (64.4% vs 44.9%, P = 0.02). A moderate to large amount of ascites was more prevalent in the prophylaxis group compared to those without prophylaxis (27.72% vs 10.20%, P = 0.02), with no other notable differences in baseline characteristics. Outcome analysis indicated lower infection rates in the prophylaxis group (11.9%) compared to the non-prophylaxis group (18.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.22–1.55, P = 0.28). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of rebleeding rates, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission. Conclusion: Antimicrobial prophylaxis in CP class A and B cirrhotic patients admitted with UGIB was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in overall infection rates without impacting rebleeding, mortality or readmission. These findings suggest that antibiotic treatment administered as needed may be adequate for patients with CP class A/B cirrhosis experiencing UGIB. However, prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate our findings and inform clinical practice guidelines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133100.71567.34
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1410 Evaluating the Role of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Child-Pugh A/B Cirrhosis With Upper GI Bleeding: Insights From a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Ali Jaan, Mostafa Najim, Farooq Ahmad Chaudhary, Erik J. Olson et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

S1410 Evaluating the Role of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Child-Pugh A/B Cirrhosis With Upper GI Bleeding: Insights From a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Ali Jaan, Mostafa Najim, Farooq Ahmad Chaudhary, Erik J. Olson, Keerthi Mannumbeth Renjith, Asim Mushtaq, Yousef Waly, Hamza Akhtar, Adeena Maryyum, Waddah Abd El-Radi, Ryan Tam, Marina Takawy, Majd Haj-Rubaeih
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in cirrhosis patients presents a considerable risk of infectious complications and mortality. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is advocated to prevent infections; however, its efficacy in Child-Pugh (CP) class A and B patients remains uncertain. This study evaluated the impact of antimicrobial prophylaxis on outcomes of UGIB among cirrhotic CP class A/B patients with UGIB. Methods: Patients with CP class A/B cirrhosis hospitalized for UGIB at 2 Rochester Regional Health hospitals from January 2020 - March 2024 were enrolled retrospectively. Patients with CP class C cirrhosis and those with bacterial infections were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on antimicrobial prophylaxis receipt. Outcomes evaluated included infection incidence within 30 days, rebleeding during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Results: We included 150 cirrhotic patients (CP class A or B) admitted for UGIB, of whom 101 received antimicrobial prophylaxis, while 49 did not. Of patients who received antimicrobial prophylaxis, a higher proportion had variceal bleeding as the etiology for bleeding compared to those who did not receive antimicrobial prophylaxis (64.4% vs 44.9%, P = 0.02). A moderate to large amount of ascites was more prevalent in the prophylaxis group compared to those without prophylaxis (27.72% vs 10.20%, P = 0.02), with no other notable differences in baseline characteristics. Outcome analysis indicated lower infection rates in the prophylaxis group (11.9%) compared to the non-prophylaxis group (18.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.22–1.55, P = 0.28). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of rebleeding rates, in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission. Conclusion: Antimicrobial prophylaxis in CP class A and B cirrhotic patients admitted with UGIB was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in overall infection rates without impacting rebleeding, mortality or readmission. These findings suggest that antibiotic treatment administered as needed may be adequate for patients with CP class A/B cirrhosis experiencing UGIB. However, prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate our findings and inform clinical practice guidelines.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.