S1458 Real-World Comparison of Upadacitinib and Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Introduction: Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor, and ustekinumab (USTE), an interleukin-12/23 inhibitor, are approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world head-to-head comparative data between these therapies remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a federated electronic health record database. Adult patients with UC who were on UPA or USTE between April 2022 and April 2024 were identified. Patients were excluded for co-diagnoses of Crohn’s disease or if they previously underwent total colectomy. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed on demographics, prior medication use (prednisone, azathioprine, mesalamine, infliximab, adalimumab), and laboratory values (albumin, CRP, fecal calprotectin). The primary outcome was systemic corticosteroids use. Secondary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visit and composite outcome of major cardiovascular events or thrombosis (pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis). Results: A total of 1,169 patients in the UPA cohort and 2,680 in the USTE cohort met inclusion criteria. After matching, 1,146 patients remained in each cohort, with balanced baseline characteristics. At 1-year follow-up, the primary outcome (corticosteroid use) occurred in 39.4% of patients in the UPA group and 43.7% in the USTE group (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.99, P = 0.038). ED visits occurred in 14.5% vs 12.9%, respectively (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.91–1.34, P = 0.27). The composite outcome of major cardiovascular events or thrombosis occurred in 1.29% vs 0.95% (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.61,3.063, P = 0.4464). Conclusion: In this real-world analysis, treatment with UPA was associated with lower rates of corticosteroid use compared to USTE in patients with ulcerative colitis over 1 year. There was no statistically significant difference in the emergency department admissions. These findings indicates potential higher effectiveness of UPA in UC compared to USTE and may inform treatment selection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133292.99186.ba
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1458 Real-World Comparison of Upadacitinib and Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Khaled Elfert, Mohamed Eldesouki, Hamza Almusabeh, Esraa Elromisy et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1458 Real-World Comparison of Upadacitinib and Ustekinumab for Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Khaled Elfert, Mohamed Eldesouki, Hamza Almusabeh, Esraa Elromisy, Jennifer Hadam-Veverka
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase-1 inhibitor, and ustekinumab (USTE), an interleukin-12/23 inhibitor, are approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world head-to-head comparative data between these therapies remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a federated electronic health record database. Adult patients with UC who were on UPA or USTE between April 2022 and April 2024 were identified. Patients were excluded for co-diagnoses of Crohn’s disease or if they previously underwent total colectomy. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed on demographics, prior medication use (prednisone, azathioprine, mesalamine, infliximab, adalimumab), and laboratory values (albumin, CRP, fecal calprotectin). The primary outcome was systemic corticosteroids use. Secondary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visit and composite outcome of major cardiovascular events or thrombosis (pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis). Results: A total of 1,169 patients in the UPA cohort and 2,680 in the USTE cohort met inclusion criteria. After matching, 1,146 patients remained in each cohort, with balanced baseline characteristics. At 1-year follow-up, the primary outcome (corticosteroid use) occurred in 39.4% of patients in the UPA group and 43.7% in the USTE group (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.99, P = 0.038). ED visits occurred in 14.5% vs 12.9%, respectively (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.91–1.34, P = 0.27). The composite outcome of major cardiovascular events or thrombosis occurred in 1.29% vs 0.95% (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.61,3.063, P = 0.4464). Conclusion: In this real-world analysis, treatment with UPA was associated with lower rates of corticosteroid use compared to USTE in patients with ulcerative colitis over 1 year. There was no statistically significant difference in the emergency department admissions. These findings indicates potential higher effectiveness of UPA in UC compared to USTE and may inform treatment selection.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.