AutoEDA: Enabling EDA Flow Automation through Microservice-Based LLM Agents

Electronic Design Automation (EDA) remains heavily reliant on tool command language (Tcl) scripting to drive complex RTL-to-GDSII flows. This scripting-based paradigm is labor-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to scale across large design projects. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) suggest a new paradigm of natural language–driven automation. However, existing EDA efforts remain limited and face key challenges, including the absence of standardized interaction protocols and dependence on external APIs that introduce privacy risks. We present AutoEDA , a framework that leverages the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to support natural-language construction and execution of evaluated RTL-to-GDSII design flows. AutoEDA combines a locally fine-tuned intent-to-IR client with stage-level MCP tools and deterministic server procedures for validation, template rendering, artifact management, execution, and report collection. We further contribute a benchmark generation pipeline for diverse EDA scenarios and extend CodeBLEU with Tcl-specific enhancements for domain-aware script-fidelity evaluation. Empirical results show that AutoEDA achieves up to 9.9 × higher CodeBLEU than the direct-generation baseline while reducing token usage by approximately 97% compared with in-context learning. Our evaluation focuses on the reliability layer of natural-language EDA automation: generating executable Tcl flows that preserve stage dependencies and produce reports for downstream timing, area, power, and routing analysis. It does not claim closed-loop QoR optimization or industrial sign-off quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3842675
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AutoEDA: Enabling EDA Flow Automation through Microservice-Based LLM Agents

H. Au, Yongjun Lu, Yiran Chen, Jingyu Pan et al.
ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
Software System Performance and Reliability
article

AutoEDA: Enabling EDA Flow Automation through Microservice-Based LLM Agents

H. Au, Yongjun Lu, Yiran Chen, Jingyu Pan, Ang Li, Junyao Zhang, Jianyi Zhang
article en

Abstract

Electronic Design Automation (EDA) remains heavily reliant on tool command language (Tcl) scripting to drive complex RTL-to-GDSII flows. This scripting-based paradigm is labor-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to scale across large design projects. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) suggest a new paradigm of natural language–driven automation. However, existing EDA efforts remain limited and face key challenges, including the absence of standardized interaction protocols and dependence on external APIs that introduce privacy risks. We present AutoEDA , a framework that leverages the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to support natural-language construction and execution of evaluated RTL-to-GDSII design flows. AutoEDA combines a locally fine-tuned intent-to-IR client with stage-level MCP tools and deterministic server procedures for validation, template rendering, artifact management, execution, and report collection. We further contribute a benchmark generation pipeline for diverse EDA scenarios and extend CodeBLEU with Tcl-specific enhancements for domain-aware script-fidelity evaluation. Empirical results show that AutoEDA achieves up to 9.9 × higher CodeBLEU than the direct-generation baseline while reducing token usage by approximately 97% compared with in-context learning. Our evaluation focuses on the reliability layer of natural-language EDA automation: generating executable Tcl flows that preserve stage dependencies and produce reports for downstream timing, area, power, and routing analysis. It does not claim closed-loop QoR optimization or industrial sign-off quality.

ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
Duke University (US), University of Florida (US), Pratt Institute (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Software System Performance and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.