S1331 Natural History and Outcomes of Patients With Upper GI Bleeding from Tumors

Introduction: Recent information evaluating the clinical course and outcomes in patients with upper GI bleeding from tumors outside clinical trials of endoscopic therapy is limited. We evaluated the outcomes of hospitalized patients with tumor-related upper GI bleeding receiving endoscopy at an urban US hospital and compared them to outcomes at the same center 10 years ago. Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized (6/2015-11/2024) with hematemesis, melena, and/or hematochezia receiving endoscopy were searched using ICD 9/10 codes for upper GI tumors. Procedure reports were reviewed to confirm biopsy-proven tumors without other causes of GI bleeding. Study endpoints included hemostasis at the conclusion of endoscopy and rebleeding. Rebleeding was defined as recurrent bleeding in patients without active bleeding on index endoscopy or whose bleeding stopped spontaneously or with endoscopic, interventional radiologic, or surgical intervention. Results: 107 (mean age 58 ± 13 years, 81 (76%) men) patients met study criteria with tumor originating from the esophagus in 13 (12%), stomach in 84 (79%), duodenum in 9 (8%), and jejunum in 1 (1%). At presentation, 62 (58%) patients did not have a prior diagnosis of malignancy and 66 (62%) had evidence of metastatic disease. Hemodynamic instability was observed in 50 (47%) patients, and 28 (26%) were on anti-thrombotic therapy. High-risk stigmata of bleeding were reported in 48 (45%) patients: active bleeding in 31 (29%) including spurting 2 (2%) and oozing 29 (27%), non-bleeding visible vessel in 3 (3%), and adherent clot in 14 (13%). Endoscopic therapy was performed in 19 (18%), including TC-325 hemostatic powder spray in 6 (6%), epinephrine injection alone in 6 (6%), hemoclips in 3 (3%), bipolar coagulation in 2 (2%), polysaccharide hemostatic powder in 1 (1%), and alcohol injection in 1 (1%). Overall, 9 (8%) patients did not attain hemostasis; 13 (13%) of 103 and 19 (19%) of 100 developed rebleeding within 3 and 7 days, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 10.6 ± 16.7 months, 50 (47%) patients developed rebleeding, similar to 48 (47%) of 103 from the 2005-2012 cohort. Conclusion: Active bleeding was encountered in nearly one-third of patients with tumor-related upper GI bleeding. Most patients attained endoscopic hemostasis with or without therapy. Similar to a decade ago, initial control of bleeding was successful in most patients, but nearly a half developed long-term recurrent bleeding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132784.68890.3b
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1331 Natural History and Outcomes of Patients With Upper GI Bleeding from Tumors

Gevork Salmastyan, Loren Laine, Sarah Sheibani, Kathy O. Lui et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1331 Natural History and Outcomes of Patients With Upper GI Bleeding from Tumors

Gevork Salmastyan, Loren Laine, Sarah Sheibani, Kathy O. Lui, Sean Dewberry, John J. Kim
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Recent information evaluating the clinical course and outcomes in patients with upper GI bleeding from tumors outside clinical trials of endoscopic therapy is limited. We evaluated the outcomes of hospitalized patients with tumor-related upper GI bleeding receiving endoscopy at an urban US hospital and compared them to outcomes at the same center 10 years ago. Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized (6/2015-11/2024) with hematemesis, melena, and/or hematochezia receiving endoscopy were searched using ICD 9/10 codes for upper GI tumors. Procedure reports were reviewed to confirm biopsy-proven tumors without other causes of GI bleeding. Study endpoints included hemostasis at the conclusion of endoscopy and rebleeding. Rebleeding was defined as recurrent bleeding in patients without active bleeding on index endoscopy or whose bleeding stopped spontaneously or with endoscopic, interventional radiologic, or surgical intervention. Results: 107 (mean age 58 ± 13 years, 81 (76%) men) patients met study criteria with tumor originating from the esophagus in 13 (12%), stomach in 84 (79%), duodenum in 9 (8%), and jejunum in 1 (1%). At presentation, 62 (58%) patients did not have a prior diagnosis of malignancy and 66 (62%) had evidence of metastatic disease. Hemodynamic instability was observed in 50 (47%) patients, and 28 (26%) were on anti-thrombotic therapy. High-risk stigmata of bleeding were reported in 48 (45%) patients: active bleeding in 31 (29%) including spurting 2 (2%) and oozing 29 (27%), non-bleeding visible vessel in 3 (3%), and adherent clot in 14 (13%). Endoscopic therapy was performed in 19 (18%), including TC-325 hemostatic powder spray in 6 (6%), epinephrine injection alone in 6 (6%), hemoclips in 3 (3%), bipolar coagulation in 2 (2%), polysaccharide hemostatic powder in 1 (1%), and alcohol injection in 1 (1%). Overall, 9 (8%) patients did not attain hemostasis; 13 (13%) of 103 and 19 (19%) of 100 developed rebleeding within 3 and 7 days, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 10.6 ± 16.7 months, 50 (47%) patients developed rebleeding, similar to 48 (47%) of 103 from the 2005-2012 cohort. Conclusion: Active bleeding was encountered in nearly one-third of patients with tumor-related upper GI bleeding. Most patients attained endoscopic hemostasis with or without therapy. Similar to a decade ago, initial control of bleeding was successful in most patients, but nearly a half developed long-term recurrent bleeding.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.