Picosecond laser drilling in thermal barrier coating superalloys with flowing water-based and underwater assistance

This paper investigated the impact of flowing water-based and flowing underwater auxiliary techniques on the quality of picosecond laser drilling. It systematically analyzed the effects of average laser power on key quality metrics, including hole entrance/exit morphology, taper, inner wall morphology, surface roughness, and oxygen content under these two distinct auxiliary conditions. The experimental results demonstrated that the entrance and exit diameters of the holes drilled using the flowing water-based method were 3.46% and 10.12% larger, respectively, compared to those drilled with the flowing underwater method. In terms of taper, the flowing water-based holes exhibited a 5.10% larger value than the flowing underwater holes. Regarding surface roughness, the entrance roughness of the holes drilled under flowing underwater conditions was 18.58% lower than that of the holes drilled under flowing water-based assistance, while the mid-section and exit roughness were 16.48% and 27.99% higher, respectively. In terms of entrance/exit morphology, the flowing water-based method induced noticeable oxidation and slag accumulation at the ceramic entrance, while the flowing underwater method showed no such defects. The exit morphology of both methods was essentially identical. For inner wall morphology, the flowing water-based method resulted in significant slag deposition at the hole entrance. Both methods exhibited grooves in the mid-section and exit, with the flowing underwater method showing a notably higher groove density compared to the flowing water-based method. Regarding oxygen content in the inner wall, the oxygen content at the entrance and mid-section under flowing water-based conditions exceeded that of the flowing underwater group by 13.83% and 31.93%, respectively, while the exit oxygen content of both methods was nearly identical. These experimental findings provided robust theoretical support for the application of different auxiliary methods in picosecond laser drilling and offered valuable insights for further improving the processing quality of thermal barrier coating superalloys through picosecond laser drilling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Optics
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.579391
Primary Topic
Laser Material Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Picosecond laser drilling in thermal barrier coating superalloys with flowing water-based and underwater assistance

Naifei Ren, Liang Frank Wang, Jie Zhang, Zhen Wu et al.
Applied Optics
Laser Material Processing Techniques
article

Picosecond laser drilling in thermal barrier coating superalloys with flowing water-based and underwater assistance

Naifei Ren, Liang Frank Wang, Jie Zhang, Zhen Wu, Kaibo Xia
article en

Abstract

This paper investigated the impact of flowing water-based and flowing underwater auxiliary techniques on the quality of picosecond laser drilling. It systematically analyzed the effects of average laser power on key quality metrics, including hole entrance/exit morphology, taper, inner wall morphology, surface roughness, and oxygen content under these two distinct auxiliary conditions. The experimental results demonstrated that the entrance and exit diameters of the holes drilled using the flowing water-based method were 3.46% and 10.12% larger, respectively, compared to those drilled with the flowing underwater method. In terms of taper, the flowing water-based holes exhibited a 5.10% larger value than the flowing underwater holes. Regarding surface roughness, the entrance roughness of the holes drilled under flowing underwater conditions was 18.58% lower than that of the holes drilled under flowing water-based assistance, while the mid-section and exit roughness were 16.48% and 27.99% higher, respectively. In terms of entrance/exit morphology, the flowing water-based method induced noticeable oxidation and slag accumulation at the ceramic entrance, while the flowing underwater method showed no such defects. The exit morphology of both methods was essentially identical. For inner wall morphology, the flowing water-based method resulted in significant slag deposition at the hole entrance. Both methods exhibited grooves in the mid-section and exit, with the flowing underwater method showing a notably higher groove density compared to the flowing water-based method. Regarding oxygen content in the inner wall, the oxygen content at the entrance and mid-section under flowing water-based conditions exceeded that of the flowing underwater group by 13.83% and 31.93%, respectively, while the exit oxygen content of both methods was nearly identical. These experimental findings provided robust theoretical support for the application of different auxiliary methods in picosecond laser drilling and offered valuable insights for further improving the processing quality of thermal barrier coating superalloys through picosecond laser drilling.

Applied OpticsVol. 65(2)
Jiangsu University (CN), Huaiyin Institute of Technology (CN), Wuxi Taihu Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Laser Material Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.