S1346 Use of a Blood Detection Capsule to Guide Endoscopic Decision-Making in High-Risk Patients With Suspected GI Bleed

Introduction: Upper Endoscopy is generally a safe procedure, however specific patient populations, such as critically ill patients and those with severe cardiopulmonary comorbidities are at higher risk of complications. A novel ingestible capsule enables early detection of upper GI bleeding through a minimally invasive approach. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this capsule on the management of patients who were high-risk for upper endoscopy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to assess the clinical application of a novel blood detection capsule in patients with a high-risk for upper endoscopy complications. Patients with suspected GI bleeding and considered high-risk for upper endoscopy complications were included. Capsule results were used to inform diagnostic and management strategies. Patients were stratified by capsule result (positive vs negative), and clinical outcomes including Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score, transfusion requirement, and hospital length of stay were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The impact of the capsule on clinical decision-making was also evaluated. Results: Twenty patients were included (mean age 64.6 ± 16.2 years, 85% man). Thirteen (65%) were in a critical care setting and 7 (35%) were regarded as high-risk for sedation-related complications. Capsule results impacted clinical management in 14/20 (70%) cases. Upper endoscopy was deferred in 8 (40%) patients, prioritized in 5 (25%), and 1 patient (5%) was intubated prior to endoscopy for airway protection because they expected large volume of blood due to the immediate detection of blood by the capsule. Among patients in which upper endoscopy was deferred, none required subsequent endoscopy, experienced readmission for gastrointestinal bleeding, or died within 30 days. Patients with a positive capsule result had higher transfusion requirements (15.9 ± 31.9 vs 2.8 ± 3.4 units, P = 0.32), higher Glasgow-Blatchford scores (15.1 ± 2.5 vs 12.6 ± 4.2; P = 0.11), and longer hospital stays (29.9 ± 57.9 vs 7.2 ± 3.0 days, P = 0.34). Conclusion: Use of the capsule guided clinical management helping to avoid or prioritize endoscopy in high-risk patients. While larger studies are needed, this device may enhance decision-making and resource allocation in the acute care of patients with suspected upper GI bleeding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132844.50257.2c
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1346 Use of a Blood Detection Capsule to Guide Endoscopic Decision-Making in High-Risk Patients With Suspected GI Bleed

Mark V. Larson, Nayantara Coelho‐Prabhu, Andrew C. Storm, Navtej Buttar et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
article

S1346 Use of a Blood Detection Capsule to Guide Endoscopic Decision-Making in High-Risk Patients With Suspected GI Bleed

Mark V. Larson, Nayantara Coelho‐Prabhu, Andrew C. Storm, Navtej Buttar, David H. Bruining, Hadi Khaled Abou Zeid, Cadman L. Leggett, Louis Wong Kee Song
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Upper Endoscopy is generally a safe procedure, however specific patient populations, such as critically ill patients and those with severe cardiopulmonary comorbidities are at higher risk of complications. A novel ingestible capsule enables early detection of upper GI bleeding through a minimally invasive approach. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this capsule on the management of patients who were high-risk for upper endoscopy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to assess the clinical application of a novel blood detection capsule in patients with a high-risk for upper endoscopy complications. Patients with suspected GI bleeding and considered high-risk for upper endoscopy complications were included. Capsule results were used to inform diagnostic and management strategies. Patients were stratified by capsule result (positive vs negative), and clinical outcomes including Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score, transfusion requirement, and hospital length of stay were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The impact of the capsule on clinical decision-making was also evaluated. Results: Twenty patients were included (mean age 64.6 ± 16.2 years, 85% man). Thirteen (65%) were in a critical care setting and 7 (35%) were regarded as high-risk for sedation-related complications. Capsule results impacted clinical management in 14/20 (70%) cases. Upper endoscopy was deferred in 8 (40%) patients, prioritized in 5 (25%), and 1 patient (5%) was intubated prior to endoscopy for airway protection because they expected large volume of blood due to the immediate detection of blood by the capsule. Among patients in which upper endoscopy was deferred, none required subsequent endoscopy, experienced readmission for gastrointestinal bleeding, or died within 30 days. Patients with a positive capsule result had higher transfusion requirements (15.9 ± 31.9 vs 2.8 ± 3.4 units, P = 0.32), higher Glasgow-Blatchford scores (15.1 ± 2.5 vs 12.6 ± 4.2; P = 0.11), and longer hospital stays (29.9 ± 57.9 vs 7.2 ± 3.0 days, P = 0.34). Conclusion: Use of the capsule guided clinical management helping to avoid or prioritize endoscopy in high-risk patients. While larger studies are needed, this device may enhance decision-making and resource allocation in the acute care of patients with suspected upper GI bleeding.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.