S4600 Subconjunctival Hemorrhage as a Rare Complication of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Introduction: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is one of the most widely performed procedures in modern medical practice, serving both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Common complications are typically linked to cardiopulmonary issues and anesthetic concerns. We present a case of subconjunctival hemorrhage (SCH), a rare and unanticipated complication during an endoscopic procedure in a healthy young man. Case Description/Methods: A 22-year-old man with a prolapsed disc on intermittent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use presented to the emergency department with acute, severe hematemesis. He appeared pale, diaphoretic and exhibited tachycardia and hypotension. He was stabilized with IV fluids and started on proton pump inhibitor infusion. The hemoglobin level was 7.2 g/dL. Platelet count and coagulation profiles were normal. EGD was performed the next day without sedation, as the patient deferred it. The endoscope was lubricated with lidocaine gel; the initial entry till mid-esophagus was smooth. On advancement, the patient experienced retching. Fundal gastritis was noted. On completion of the procedure, severe diffuse scleral redness and periorbital swelling were noted bilaterally. An urgent ophthalmological review confirmed bilateral SCH, and conservative management was advised. The SCH resolved within 2 weeks. After a month, EGD was repeated with sedation to reassess the erosion, which was uneventful. Discussion: EGD is recognized for its exceptional safety profile, with rare complications such as infection (<.3%), bleeding (<.1%), and cardiopulmonary complications (<.1%). Incidence of SCH after an endoscopy is remarkably rare and last reported in 2001. SCH’s risk factors are systemic vascular and bleeding disorders, thrombocytopenia, liver failure, or current usage of antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants. None of them were noticed in our case. Retching during EGD likely contributed to the rupture of conjunctival blood vessels. Gastroenterologists should be vigilant when performing EGD, especially in patients with the aforementioned risk factors. In such cases, careful patient assessment, pre-procedure optimization, and consideration of sedation to minimize retching are key factors in reducing adverse events.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001145860.59333.e6
Primary Topic
Restraint-Related Deaths
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S4600 Subconjunctival Hemorrhage as a Rare Complication of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Sahil Dudhat, Balakrishnan Arivalagan, Franklin Sosa, Fnu Veena et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Restraint-Related Deaths
article

S4600 Subconjunctival Hemorrhage as a Rare Complication of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Sahil Dudhat, Balakrishnan Arivalagan, Franklin Sosa, Fnu Veena, Mikhail Sukhoroslov, Rayan Faisal Grib Alataa
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is one of the most widely performed procedures in modern medical practice, serving both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Common complications are typically linked to cardiopulmonary issues and anesthetic concerns. We present a case of subconjunctival hemorrhage (SCH), a rare and unanticipated complication during an endoscopic procedure in a healthy young man. Case Description/Methods: A 22-year-old man with a prolapsed disc on intermittent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use presented to the emergency department with acute, severe hematemesis. He appeared pale, diaphoretic and exhibited tachycardia and hypotension. He was stabilized with IV fluids and started on proton pump inhibitor infusion. The hemoglobin level was 7.2 g/dL. Platelet count and coagulation profiles were normal. EGD was performed the next day without sedation, as the patient deferred it. The endoscope was lubricated with lidocaine gel; the initial entry till mid-esophagus was smooth. On advancement, the patient experienced retching. Fundal gastritis was noted. On completion of the procedure, severe diffuse scleral redness and periorbital swelling were noted bilaterally. An urgent ophthalmological review confirmed bilateral SCH, and conservative management was advised. The SCH resolved within 2 weeks. After a month, EGD was repeated with sedation to reassess the erosion, which was uneventful. Discussion: EGD is recognized for its exceptional safety profile, with rare complications such as infection (<.3%), bleeding (<.1%), and cardiopulmonary complications (<.1%). Incidence of SCH after an endoscopy is remarkably rare and last reported in 2001. SCH’s risk factors are systemic vascular and bleeding disorders, thrombocytopenia, liver failure, or current usage of antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants. None of them were noticed in our case. Retching during EGD likely contributed to the rupture of conjunctival blood vessels. Gastroenterologists should be vigilant when performing EGD, especially in patients with the aforementioned risk factors. In such cases, careful patient assessment, pre-procedure optimization, and consideration of sedation to minimize retching are key factors in reducing adverse events.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Restraint-Related Deaths
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.