S1373 Bleeding Differently: Variceal vs Non-Variceal GI Bleeds in Sarcoidosis – Who Fares Better?

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease affecting multiple organs, including the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Luminal involvement of the GI tract is rare but potentially life-threatening. Variceal bleeding in sarcoidosis is likely due to liver involvement progressing to cirrhosis. Nonvariceal bleeding could be due to chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use, steroids, and vascular involvement. Data comparing variceal and non-variceal bleeding outcomes in sarcoidosis is limited. This study compares patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the need for interventions in sarcoidosis patients with variceal and non-variceal GI bleeds. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult hospitalizations with sarcoidosis using appropriate ICD-10 codes. They were divided into 2 groups based on variceal and non-variceal gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and the chi-square test and independent sample t-test were used to compare outcomes in variceal and non-variceal bleeding. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. A P-value less than 0.05 was set to determine statistical significance. Results: Overall, 384,375 adult hospitalizations with sarcoidosis were identified. Among patients with GI bleeding, 12.2% had variceal and 87.8% had non-variceal bleeding. The variceal cohort was younger (mean age 57 vs 62) and predominantly man. Hospitalizations with sarcoidosis and variceal bleeding had significantly lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.37, P-value 0.02). However, they were more likely to receive endoscopic intervention (aOR 3.98, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of shock, acute kidney injury (AKI), need for blood transfusions, vasopressor requirement, or ventilator support. Conclusion: Our study highlights key differences in outcomes between variceal and non-variceal GI bleeding in sarcoidosis patients. Despite being younger and having lower mortality rates, the variceal group had a higher need for endoscopic intervention. Variceal bleeding has well-established protocols for management and is more amenable to interventions like variceal banding and sclerotherapy. Non-variceal bleeding can be more heterogeneous and is often due to superficial mucosal bleeding which is unsuitable for endoscopic intervention. Further studies are warranted to explore these differences and optimize the management of GI bleeding in sarcoidosis patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132952.84530.32
Primary Topic
Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1373 Bleeding Differently: Variceal vs Non-Variceal GI Bleeds in Sarcoidosis – Who Fares Better?

Aashay Dharia, Manasa Ginjupalli, Sweta Lohani, Chirag S. Desai
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
article

S1373 Bleeding Differently: Variceal vs Non-Variceal GI Bleeds in Sarcoidosis – Who Fares Better?

Aashay Dharia, Manasa Ginjupalli, Sweta Lohani, Chirag S. Desai
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease affecting multiple organs, including the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Luminal involvement of the GI tract is rare but potentially life-threatening. Variceal bleeding in sarcoidosis is likely due to liver involvement progressing to cirrhosis. Nonvariceal bleeding could be due to chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use, steroids, and vascular involvement. Data comparing variceal and non-variceal bleeding outcomes in sarcoidosis is limited. This study compares patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and the need for interventions in sarcoidosis patients with variceal and non-variceal GI bleeds. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2020 to identify adult hospitalizations with sarcoidosis using appropriate ICD-10 codes. They were divided into 2 groups based on variceal and non-variceal gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and the chi-square test and independent sample t-test were used to compare outcomes in variceal and non-variceal bleeding. Logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. A P-value less than 0.05 was set to determine statistical significance. Results: Overall, 384,375 adult hospitalizations with sarcoidosis were identified. Among patients with GI bleeding, 12.2% had variceal and 87.8% had non-variceal bleeding. The variceal cohort was younger (mean age 57 vs 62) and predominantly man. Hospitalizations with sarcoidosis and variceal bleeding had significantly lower odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.37, P-value 0.02). However, they were more likely to receive endoscopic intervention (aOR 3.98, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of shock, acute kidney injury (AKI), need for blood transfusions, vasopressor requirement, or ventilator support. Conclusion: Our study highlights key differences in outcomes between variceal and non-variceal GI bleeding in sarcoidosis patients. Despite being younger and having lower mortality rates, the variceal group had a higher need for endoscopic intervention. Variceal bleeding has well-established protocols for management and is more amenable to interventions like variceal banding and sclerotherapy. Non-variceal bleeding can be more heterogeneous and is often due to superficial mucosal bleeding which is unsuitable for endoscopic intervention. Further studies are warranted to explore these differences and optimize the management of GI bleeding in sarcoidosis patients.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.