Mapping the path to diversity in clinical trials: a qualitative study of community member and stakeholder perspectives

Patient diversity in clinical trials has been a critical issue in the advancement of translational scientific research. There is a dire need for better representation of all populations to understand the efficacy of novel therapeutics and health interventions for promising outcomes. The current study aims to identify key factors that may lead to equitable participation in clinical research. This qualitative study included focus groups with lower-income, racially or ethnically diverse community members (n = 51) and research stakeholders (n = 50) to identify factors that influence clinical trial participation. Focus groups were conducted between November 2023 and May 2024 within community-settings in Dallas, Texas. Directed Content Analysis using the Socioecological Model (SEM) as the theoretical framework was utilized for data analysis. Key barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies to clinical trial participation across four levels – individual, interpersonal, community, and macroeconomic/policy – were identified from the perspectives of community members and research stakeholders, separately. Prominent barriers included fear and mistrust at the individual level; misconceptions at the interpersonal level; historical experiences (defined as collective mistreatment faced by the participant’s community), lack of knowledge, and logistics at the community level; systemic mistrust as well as racism and consent/study language at the macroeconomic/policy level. Facilitators included personal health knowledge, monetary incentives, and safety at the individual level; trusted relationships and family health knowledge at the interpersonal level; altruism at the community level; transparency of safety/risk at the macroeconomic/policy level. Implementation strategies proposed were rebuilding trust, building relationships through community engagement, increasing awareness about clinical research, and leveraging culturally tailored resources to promote inclusiveness. Underrepresentation of diverse populations in clinical studies warrants the need to consider multifaceted approaches to mitigate the current public health crisis. Ultimately, building trust, community engagement to promote knowledge and awareness, and transparency are essential for improving diversity in clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25574-z
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the path to diversity in clinical trials: a qualitative study of community member and stakeholder perspectives

Heather Kitzman, Meera Patel, Ketan Tamirisa, Emilie Ruiz et al.
BMC Public Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Mapping the path to diversity in clinical trials: a qualitative study of community member and stakeholder perspectives

Heather Kitzman, Meera Patel, Ketan Tamirisa, Emilie Ruiz, Zahria Griggs, Eunice Huan
article en

Abstract

Patient diversity in clinical trials has been a critical issue in the advancement of translational scientific research. There is a dire need for better representation of all populations to understand the efficacy of novel therapeutics and health interventions for promising outcomes. The current study aims to identify key factors that may lead to equitable participation in clinical research. This qualitative study included focus groups with lower-income, racially or ethnically diverse community members (n = 51) and research stakeholders (n = 50) to identify factors that influence clinical trial participation. Focus groups were conducted between November 2023 and May 2024 within community-settings in Dallas, Texas. Directed Content Analysis using the Socioecological Model (SEM) as the theoretical framework was utilized for data analysis. Key barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies to clinical trial participation across four levels – individual, interpersonal, community, and macroeconomic/policy – were identified from the perspectives of community members and research stakeholders, separately. Prominent barriers included fear and mistrust at the individual level; misconceptions at the interpersonal level; historical experiences (defined as collective mistreatment faced by the participant’s community), lack of knowledge, and logistics at the community level; systemic mistrust as well as racism and consent/study language at the macroeconomic/policy level. Facilitators included personal health knowledge, monetary incentives, and safety at the individual level; trusted relationships and family health knowledge at the interpersonal level; altruism at the community level; transparency of safety/risk at the macroeconomic/policy level. Implementation strategies proposed were rebuilding trust, building relationships through community engagement, increasing awareness about clinical research, and leveraging culturally tailored resources to promote inclusiveness. Underrepresentation of diverse populations in clinical studies warrants the need to consider multifaceted approaches to mitigate the current public health crisis. Ultimately, building trust, community engagement to promote knowledge and awareness, and transparency are essential for improving diversity in clinical trials.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.