A systematic model for health systems to prevent and respond to health emergencies in the workplace

There is a research gap in explaining the health system’s role in responding to pandemics and other health emergencies within a systematic framework. This study aims to present a systematic model for health systems to respond to health emergencies in the workplace, drawing on national and international experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on Iran as a case study. This study employed a qualitative, content analysis approach, utilizing a triangulation method to collect and analyze data. Data were gathered through document review and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using inductive and deductive content analysis techniques. The trustworthiness of the findings was assessed using five criteria, including credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability, and stability. The resulting systematic model consists of 45 subthemes, 22 themes, seven dimensions, and four domains. At the domain and subdomain levels, the health system should, during the planning phase, develop a documented plan that understands the context of workplaces in the health emergency and includes leadership commitment and workplace participation. During the operational phase, the health system should implement measures to control the emergency while providing necessary support. During the checking phase, the health system should evaluate performance in the context of the emergency. In the acting phase, the health system should continuously improve its response based on feedback. Health systems, along with other workplace stakeholders, play a critical role in a systematic feedback loop during health emergencies. The proposed model, customized for specific contexts, can serve as a framework for health systems to respond effectively to workplace health emergencies. Future research should focus on testing the model in diverse settings, with an emphasis on both qualitative and quantitative assessments of its effectiveness and efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13693-7
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic model for health systems to prevent and respond to health emergencies in the workplace

Narmin Hassanzadeh‐Rangi, Yahya Khosravi, Mitra Faghihi, Masoud Motalebi Gh et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Disaster Response and Management
article

A systematic model for health systems to prevent and respond to health emergencies in the workplace

Narmin Hassanzadeh‐Rangi, Yahya Khosravi, Mitra Faghihi, Masoud Motalebi Gh, Ali Asghar Farshad, Elahe Ezati, Soudabeh Yarmohammadi
article en

Abstract

There is a research gap in explaining the health system’s role in responding to pandemics and other health emergencies within a systematic framework. This study aims to present a systematic model for health systems to respond to health emergencies in the workplace, drawing on national and international experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on Iran as a case study. This study employed a qualitative, content analysis approach, utilizing a triangulation method to collect and analyze data. Data were gathered through document review and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using inductive and deductive content analysis techniques. The trustworthiness of the findings was assessed using five criteria, including credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability, and stability. The resulting systematic model consists of 45 subthemes, 22 themes, seven dimensions, and four domains. At the domain and subdomain levels, the health system should, during the planning phase, develop a documented plan that understands the context of workplaces in the health emergency and includes leadership commitment and workplace participation. During the operational phase, the health system should implement measures to control the emergency while providing necessary support. During the checking phase, the health system should evaluate performance in the context of the emergency. In the acting phase, the health system should continuously improve its response based on feedback. Health systems, along with other workplace stakeholders, play a critical role in a systematic feedback loop during health emergencies. The proposed model, customized for specific contexts, can serve as a framework for health systems to respond effectively to workplace health emergencies. Future research should focus on testing the model in diverse settings, with an emphasis on both qualitative and quantitative assessments of its effectiveness and efficiency.

BMC Health Services ResearchVol. 25(1)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR), Alborz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.