S1116 Investigation of Osmotically Active Contrast Solutions in the Quantification of Visceral Hypersensitivity: A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Visceral hypersensitivity (VH) is a key component of many disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), including functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Existing tests of VH in DGBIs, like rectal or jejunal barostat, are invasive, expensive, and limited to specialized centers. As such, objective diagnosis of VH remains elusive. Computed tomography enterography (CTE), used to assess small bowel pathology, utilizes oral, osmotically active mannitol and sorbitol-based agent as neutral contrast timed for small bowel distension and can cause gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study investigates the utility of contrast-induced symptoms as a noninvasive biomarker for VH in DGBIs, particularly in the small bowel. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center among patients undergoing CTE for various indications. GI symptom burden was assessed using questionnaires before (–24 h), immediately after (0 h), and at 4–24 h post-CTE. Demographics were extracted from electronic health records. Patients were categorized as IBS, FD, both, or neither (No DBGI) based on a prospectively administered abridged bowel disease questionnaire (ABDQ). Results: Of 75 patients enrolled, 4 were excluded due to prior bowel surgery (2) or active C. difficile (2). Patients without active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were classified as IBS (n = 9), FD (n = 7), FD + IBS (n = 23), and No DGBI (n = 19); 2 had inactive IBD (1 in IBS, 1 in FD + IBS). The IBS group had the greatest mean abdominal pain increase from 0 h to 4-24 h (2.44 ± 1.13, P = 0.01) and the highest overall change from -24 to 4–24 h (1.56 ± 1.33, P = 0.02). At specific time points, the FD + IBS and FD only group had the highest pain at -24 h (3.25 ± 1.65; 3 ± 1.83 P < 0.001) and at 0 h (2.29 ± 1.88, 1.14 ± 0.9 P < 0.001). Patients with IBS or FD + IBS showed the highest pain level at 4–24 h (P = 0.05). Conclusion: Symptom exacerbation after consuming osmotically active contrast was more severe in patients who met DGBI criteria by ABDQ. Differential timing of symptom exacerbation further subtyped the DGBIs, though it was limited by small sample sizes. FD patients showed symptom increase earliest while IBS patients demonstrated delayed symptom exacerbation, suggesting visceral hypersensitivity in the distal GI tract. Those with both had the highest symptom burden, suggesting a potential additive effect. Additional research comparing VH to healthy controls can further clarify the utility of symptom exacerbation with osmotically active solution as a VH biomarker.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001131924.44214.dc
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1116 Investigation of Osmotically Active Contrast Solutions in the Quantification of Visceral Hypersensitivity: A Prospective Cohort Study

Riya Gupta, David J. Bartlett, Victor Chedid, Moataz Aboeldahb et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

S1116 Investigation of Osmotically Active Contrast Solutions in the Quantification of Visceral Hypersensitivity: A Prospective Cohort Study

Riya Gupta, David J. Bartlett, Victor Chedid, Moataz Aboeldahb, Xiao‐Jing Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Visceral hypersensitivity (VH) is a key component of many disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), including functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Existing tests of VH in DGBIs, like rectal or jejunal barostat, are invasive, expensive, and limited to specialized centers. As such, objective diagnosis of VH remains elusive. Computed tomography enterography (CTE), used to assess small bowel pathology, utilizes oral, osmotically active mannitol and sorbitol-based agent as neutral contrast timed for small bowel distension and can cause gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. This study investigates the utility of contrast-induced symptoms as a noninvasive biomarker for VH in DGBIs, particularly in the small bowel. Methods: A prospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center among patients undergoing CTE for various indications. GI symptom burden was assessed using questionnaires before (–24 h), immediately after (0 h), and at 4–24 h post-CTE. Demographics were extracted from electronic health records. Patients were categorized as IBS, FD, both, or neither (No DBGI) based on a prospectively administered abridged bowel disease questionnaire (ABDQ). Results: Of 75 patients enrolled, 4 were excluded due to prior bowel surgery (2) or active C. difficile (2). Patients without active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were classified as IBS (n = 9), FD (n = 7), FD + IBS (n = 23), and No DGBI (n = 19); 2 had inactive IBD (1 in IBS, 1 in FD + IBS). The IBS group had the greatest mean abdominal pain increase from 0 h to 4-24 h (2.44 ± 1.13, P = 0.01) and the highest overall change from -24 to 4–24 h (1.56 ± 1.33, P = 0.02). At specific time points, the FD + IBS and FD only group had the highest pain at -24 h (3.25 ± 1.65; 3 ± 1.83 P < 0.001) and at 0 h (2.29 ± 1.88, 1.14 ± 0.9 P < 0.001). Patients with IBS or FD + IBS showed the highest pain level at 4–24 h (P = 0.05). Conclusion: Symptom exacerbation after consuming osmotically active contrast was more severe in patients who met DGBI criteria by ABDQ. Differential timing of symptom exacerbation further subtyped the DGBIs, though it was limited by small sample sizes. FD patients showed symptom increase earliest while IBS patients demonstrated delayed symptom exacerbation, suggesting visceral hypersensitivity in the distal GI tract. Those with both had the highest symptom burden, suggesting a potential additive effect. Additional research comparing VH to healthy controls can further clarify the utility of symptom exacerbation with osmotically active solution as a VH biomarker.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.