Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Conventional Anticoagulants Alone in Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition and a leading cause of sudden death. It occurs when a thrombus develops in the venous system and then dislodges to embolize into the pulmonary arteries, causing obstruction. The current mainstay of treatment is anticoagulation. Adjunct mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or pharmacological thrombolysis may be added, following a risk assessment, for intermediate to massive PE. However, physicians remain reluctant to adopt them as first-line treatment when comparing the benefits and risks to anticoagulation alone. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of MT with anticoagulation therapy alone in the treatment of intermediate to large-sized PE patients, focusing on hospital stay, ICU admission, morbidity, and mortality. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published from inception up to July 5, 2025. Studies were then screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of evidence. Studies were required to report at least one of the following outcomes: mortality rate, hospital stay, overall complications, and ICU stay. Screening & data were extracted independently by eight co-authors, and a senior co-author resolved all conflicts. From a pool of 5661 studies, a total of six studies (1509 patients) were included. MT was associated with a trend toward lower all-cause mortality (OR = 0.5, 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.01; p = 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 46%) and a significantly lower rate of ICU length of stay by 3.0 days than those in the anticoagulant therapy group (MD: - 3.01, 95% CI, -5.57 to -0.44, p = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%). No significant difference was found in overall complications and length of hospital stay between the MT and anticoagulant groups. However, MT was associated with lower rates of overall complications by 49% (OR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.10 to 2.67, p = 0.43; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%) and shorter hospital stays (MD: -0.76; 95% CI, -4.64 to 3.13, p = 0.70; I<sup>2</sup> = 93%). MT showed greater efficacy in reducing mortality rates and ICU stay compared to intermediate to high-risk PE patients treated with conventional anticoagulant therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70412
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Conventional Anticoagulants Alone in Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Abdulrahman Elhelbawy, Yousef M. Husseiny, Mounzer Soued, Reem Husseiny et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Conventional Anticoagulants Alone in Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Abdulrahman Elhelbawy, Yousef M. Husseiny, Mounzer Soued, Reem Husseiny, Fouad Hanna, Ali Dway, Hamza A. Abdul‐Hafez, Shrouk Ramadan, Ahmed Hassan, Fahed Negmeldin
article en

Abstract

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition and a leading cause of sudden death. It occurs when a thrombus develops in the venous system and then dislodges to embolize into the pulmonary arteries, causing obstruction. The current mainstay of treatment is anticoagulation. Adjunct mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or pharmacological thrombolysis may be added, following a risk assessment, for intermediate to massive PE. However, physicians remain reluctant to adopt them as first-line treatment when comparing the benefits and risks to anticoagulation alone. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of MT with anticoagulation therapy alone in the treatment of intermediate to large-sized PE patients, focusing on hospital stay, ICU admission, morbidity, and mortality. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published from inception up to July 5, 2025. Studies were then screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of evidence. Studies were required to report at least one of the following outcomes: mortality rate, hospital stay, overall complications, and ICU stay. Screening & data were extracted independently by eight co-authors, and a senior co-author resolved all conflicts. From a pool of 5661 studies, a total of six studies (1509 patients) were included. MT was associated with a trend toward lower all-cause mortality (OR = 0.5, 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.01; p = 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 46%) and a significantly lower rate of ICU length of stay by 3.0 days than those in the anticoagulant therapy group (MD: - 3.01, 95% CI, -5.57 to -0.44, p = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%). No significant difference was found in overall complications and length of hospital stay between the MT and anticoagulant groups. However, MT was associated with lower rates of overall complications by 49% (OR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.10 to 2.67, p = 0.43; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%) and shorter hospital stays (MD: -0.76; 95% CI, -4.64 to 3.13, p = 0.70; I<sup>2</sup> = 93%). MT showed greater efficacy in reducing mortality rates and ICU stay compared to intermediate to high-risk PE patients treated with conventional anticoagulant therapy.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsVol. 107(3)
Ain Shams University (EG), Cairo University (EG), University of California, Los Angeles (US), An-Najah National University (PS), Tanta University (EG), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Al Andalus University (SY), October 6 University (EG), Helwan University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.