Comparison of non-linear models for growth characterization of purebred Ayrshire and crossbred cattle

Abstract. The objective of this study was to compare four non-linear mathematical models in terms of evaluating the growth pattern of Ayrshire and crossbred (Norwegian Red × Ayrshire) cattle. Monthly live-weight (kg) records of 725 cows were collected from birth to 540 d of age. The growth curves were analyzed using negative exponential, logistic, Richard, and Gompertz models. Parameters were estimated with the NLMIXED procedure, and model fit was assessed using Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), the overall standard error (OSE), and the adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj-R2). The Gompertz model occasionally provided higher explanatory power (Adj-R2 up to 0.95) and lower prediction error (OSE as low as 4.5), but the Richard model consistently yielded the lowest AIC and BIC values, making it the most reliable and parsimonious choice. Growth curves showed that females attained substantially higher mature body weights than males, with crossbred cattle generally being heavier than purebred Ayrshire. These findings demonstrate the utility of the Richard model for accurately describing and predicting cattle growth, providing valuable information for genetic selection, herd management, and breeding strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives animal breeding/Archiv für Tierzucht
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-68-721-2025
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of non-linear models for growth characterization of purebred Ayrshire and crossbred cattle

Özge KOZAKLI, Мykhailo Matvieiev, Andriy Getya, Ayhan Ceyhan et al.
Archives animal breeding/Archiv für Tierzucht
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Comparison of non-linear models for growth characterization of purebred Ayrshire and crossbred cattle

Özge KOZAKLI, Мykhailo Matvieiev, Andriy Getya, Ayhan Ceyhan, S. Ruban, Oleksandr Borshch
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The objective of this study was to compare four non-linear mathematical models in terms of evaluating the growth pattern of Ayrshire and crossbred (Norwegian Red × Ayrshire) cattle. Monthly live-weight (kg) records of 725 cows were collected from birth to 540 d of age. The growth curves were analyzed using negative exponential, logistic, Richard, and Gompertz models. Parameters were estimated with the NLMIXED procedure, and model fit was assessed using Akaike's information criterion (AIC), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), the overall standard error (OSE), and the adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj-R2). The Gompertz model occasionally provided higher explanatory power (Adj-R2 up to 0.95) and lower prediction error (OSE as low as 4.5), but the Richard model consistently yielded the lowest AIC and BIC values, making it the most reliable and parsimonious choice. Growth curves showed that females attained substantially higher mature body weights than males, with crossbred cattle generally being heavier than purebred Ayrshire. These findings demonstrate the utility of the Richard model for accurately describing and predicting cattle growth, providing valuable information for genetic selection, herd management, and breeding strategies.

Archives animal breeding/Archiv für TierzuchtVol. 68(4)
Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi (TR), National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine (UA), National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine (UA), Poltava State Agrarian University (UA), Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University (UA)
European Commission, European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.