On the Association of Community Belonging With Over Time Changes in Self‐Rated Health and Mental Health Since the COVID‐19 Pandemic

This study evaluates how community belonging influences over time changes in self-rated health (SRH) and self-rated mental health (SRMH) after the COVID-19 pandemic using a large Canadian population survey (N = 9013, response rate 25%). The study uses descriptive analysis and a set of ordered logistic regressions. The results suggest that 1 year after the height of the pandemic, most of the respondents consider their SRH and SRMH as excellent, good, or fair, with 89.1% for SRH and 85.7% for SRMH. By contrast, only 10.8% and 14.3% of respondents reported poor and very poor SRH and SRMH. Furthermore, about 25%-29% of respondents reported that their SRH and SRMH became better over time, and only 11%-12% reported worsening SRH and SRMH, while the rest reported no changes. Regression results suggest that higher levels of community belonging are associated with higher SRH and SRHM. For instance, reporting strong community belonging is associated with higher SRH (OR = 4.734, 95% CI [4.004, 5.598]) and SRMH (OR = 5.778, 95% CI [4.879, 6.842]). Moreover, they suggest that a higher level of community belonging is associated with perceived improvement over time in SRH and SRMH. For example, reporting strong community belonging is associated with more improvement over time in SRH (OR = 2.105, 95% CI [1.757, 2.523]) and SRHM (OR = 1.927, 95% CI [1.607, 2.312]). The study concluded by discussing theoretical, policy, and methodological implications of these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70040
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Association of Community Belonging With Over Time Changes in Self‐Rated Health and Mental Health Since the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Alena Auchynnikava, Yunhong Lyu, Lida Fan, Nazim Habibov
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Health disparities and outcomes
article

On the Association of Community Belonging With Over Time Changes in Self‐Rated Health and Mental Health Since the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Alena Auchynnikava, Yunhong Lyu, Lida Fan, Nazim Habibov
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates how community belonging influences over time changes in self-rated health (SRH) and self-rated mental health (SRMH) after the COVID-19 pandemic using a large Canadian population survey (N = 9013, response rate 25%). The study uses descriptive analysis and a set of ordered logistic regressions. The results suggest that 1 year after the height of the pandemic, most of the respondents consider their SRH and SRMH as excellent, good, or fair, with 89.1% for SRH and 85.7% for SRMH. By contrast, only 10.8% and 14.3% of respondents reported poor and very poor SRH and SRMH. Furthermore, about 25%-29% of respondents reported that their SRH and SRMH became better over time, and only 11%-12% reported worsening SRH and SRMH, while the rest reported no changes. Regression results suggest that higher levels of community belonging are associated with higher SRH and SRHM. For instance, reporting strong community belonging is associated with higher SRH (OR = 4.734, 95% CI [4.004, 5.598]) and SRMH (OR = 5.778, 95% CI [4.879, 6.842]). Moreover, they suggest that a higher level of community belonging is associated with perceived improvement over time in SRH and SRMH. For example, reporting strong community belonging is associated with more improvement over time in SRH (OR = 2.105, 95% CI [1.757, 2.523]) and SRHM (OR = 1.927, 95% CI [1.607, 2.312]). The study concluded by discussing theoretical, policy, and methodological implications of these findings.

The International Journal of Health Planning and ManagementVol. 41(1)
Trent University (CA), Lakehead University (CA), University of Windsor (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.