An exploration of the role of stigma in socially responsible gift giving

Purpose Stigmatization and discrimination are prevalent concerns in contemporary society, leading to adverse psychological and physical consequences for individuals facing stigma-related prejudice. However, whether and why stigma plays a role in gift-giving is largely unexplored. This research explores the variance in giver’s perceived fit between gifts that are socially responsible and those that are not when the recipient belongs to a stigmatized group or not. Design/methodology/approach The article employs multiple online experiments with an average sample size of around 300 per experiment. Findings The article shows that givers perceive a socially responsible gift as a better fit for nonstigmatized recipients, but not for stigmatized recipients and that such a bias is enhanced for vice versus virtuous gifts. These findings are robust across types of stigmas and are explained by a greater self-presentation concern, and consequently, appreciation concern for the gift giver when the recipient is not stigmatized. Research limitations/implications We only looked at two types of stigma – body weight and SES. Future research should investigate whether the effects stay consistent across different types of stigma or whether there are important differences. Practical implications This research provides insight into the challenges that companies that offer socially responsible products may face when consumers consider choosing them as a gift for stigmatized recipients. To overcome this barrier, firms and social messaging as a whole need to showcase stigmatized individuals as deserving of enjoyment and being capable of adopting a sustainable lifestyle. Originality/value The article is the first to offer empirical evidence that biases may exist against stigmatized groups in the context of gifting. It thus enriches the literature concerning marketing to stigmatized persons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2025-0236
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An exploration of the role of stigma in socially responsible gift giving

Abhi Bhattacharya, Tongxi Wang, Elissa Borchert Shults
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

An exploration of the role of stigma in socially responsible gift giving

Abhi Bhattacharya, Tongxi Wang, Elissa Borchert Shults
article en

Abstract

Purpose Stigmatization and discrimination are prevalent concerns in contemporary society, leading to adverse psychological and physical consequences for individuals facing stigma-related prejudice. However, whether and why stigma plays a role in gift-giving is largely unexplored. This research explores the variance in giver’s perceived fit between gifts that are socially responsible and those that are not when the recipient belongs to a stigmatized group or not. Design/methodology/approach The article employs multiple online experiments with an average sample size of around 300 per experiment. Findings The article shows that givers perceive a socially responsible gift as a better fit for nonstigmatized recipients, but not for stigmatized recipients and that such a bias is enhanced for vice versus virtuous gifts. These findings are robust across types of stigmas and are explained by a greater self-presentation concern, and consequently, appreciation concern for the gift giver when the recipient is not stigmatized. Research limitations/implications We only looked at two types of stigma – body weight and SES. Future research should investigate whether the effects stay consistent across different types of stigma or whether there are important differences. Practical implications This research provides insight into the challenges that companies that offer socially responsible products may face when consumers consider choosing them as a gift for stigmatized recipients. To overcome this barrier, firms and social messaging as a whole need to showcase stigmatized individuals as deserving of enjoyment and being capable of adopting a sustainable lifestyle. Originality/value The article is the first to offer empirical evidence that biases may exist against stigmatized groups in the context of gifting. It thus enriches the literature concerning marketing to stigmatized persons.

Marketing Intelligence & Planning
Western Carolina University (US), University of Alabama System (US), Grand Valley State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.