The Embedded Network: Institutional Constraints on Collaborative Governance in Indonesia's Aviation Safety Program

ABSTRACT Why do collaborative governance reforms so often falter in non‐Western states with deep administrative traditions? This article argues that while managerial practice is relevant, the primary cause of these shortcomings lies in macro‐level institutional constraints that powerfully shape network outcomes. Through a qualitative case study of Indonesia's mandated State Safety Program (SSP), we trace the network's observed meso‐level pathologies—a weak ad hoc hub and fragmentation—to their macro‐level institutional origins. Our analysis identifies three primary constraining forces: path dependency stemming from macro‐policy, the historical legacy of a siloed state, and friction from entrenched bureaucratic logics. The primary contribution of this research is to advance institutional theory by specifying a clear multi‐level causal mechanism linking macro‐level state institutional constraints to the network's meso‐level structure and its micro‐level procedural dysfunctions. We conclude that for collaborative governance to be effective, reform efforts must shift from improving micro‐level behaviors to strategically targeting the fundamental institutional “rules of the game”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Governance
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70100
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Embedded Network: Institutional Constraints on Collaborative Governance in Indonesia's Aviation Safety Program

Oke Hendra, Eko Prasojo, Reza Fathurrahman
Governance
Global Security and Public Health
article

The Embedded Network: Institutional Constraints on Collaborative Governance in Indonesia's Aviation Safety Program

Oke Hendra, Eko Prasojo, Reza Fathurrahman
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Why do collaborative governance reforms so often falter in non‐Western states with deep administrative traditions? This article argues that while managerial practice is relevant, the primary cause of these shortcomings lies in macro‐level institutional constraints that powerfully shape network outcomes. Through a qualitative case study of Indonesia's mandated State Safety Program (SSP), we trace the network's observed meso‐level pathologies—a weak ad hoc hub and fragmentation—to their macro‐level institutional origins. Our analysis identifies three primary constraining forces: path dependency stemming from macro‐policy, the historical legacy of a siloed state, and friction from entrenched bureaucratic logics. The primary contribution of this research is to advance institutional theory by specifying a clear multi‐level causal mechanism linking macro‐level state institutional constraints to the network's meso‐level structure and its micro‐level procedural dysfunctions. We conclude that for collaborative governance to be effective, reform efforts must shift from improving micro‐level behaviors to strategically targeting the fundamental institutional “rules of the game”.

GovernanceVol. 39(1)
University of Indonesia (ID), National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.