Nonfiction Picturebook Reading in Early and Elementary Education: A <scp>PRISMA</scp> ‐P Systematic Review

ABSTRACT This systematic review, conducted under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Protocols (PRISMA‐P), provides the first comprehensive synthesis of empirical research on nonfiction picturebook reading in early childhood and primary education between 2000 and 2024. Drawing on 34 peer‐reviewed studies, it traces the evolution of a genre that has gained increasing curricular and editorial prominence but remains underexplored in educational practice. The review highlights the transformative potential of nonfiction picturebooks as multimodal, aesthetic, and affective texts that foster reading comprehension, visual and informational literacy, and the development of active, critical, and socially engaged readers. Methodologically, the review followed the PRISMA‐P protocol for qualitative and mixed‐methods research, guided by the Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research Type (SPIDER) framework. Studies were identified through a multi‐database search strategy—using the Web of Science (WOS), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), ProQuest, and Dialnet—and selected according to explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and analysis were carried out using Microsoft Excel and NVivo through a two‐phase coding process that combined quantitative and qualitative synthesis. Findings reveal a predominance of qualitative designs, dialogic and adult‐mediated reading strategies, and interventions conducted primarily in formal educational settings, with a strong concentration in the United States. Despite consistent evidence supporting the pedagogical value of nonfiction picturebooks, substantial gaps persist—particularly regarding autonomous reading, emotional and aesthetic responses, and research in non‐Anglophone or informal contexts such as families and libraries. By identifying the theoretical assumptions, reading strategies, and outcomes of existing research, this review positions the nonfiction picturebook not merely as an instructional tool but as a multimodal and affective medium for reimagining literacy education, nurturing curiosity, creativity, and agency in young readers across diverse educational landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reading Research Quarterly
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.70081
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonfiction Picturebook Reading in Early and Elementary Education: A PRISMA ‐P Systematic Review

Diana Muela Bermejo, Rosa Tabernero Sala
Reading Research Quarterly
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Nonfiction Picturebook Reading in Early and Elementary Education: A PRISMA ‐P Systematic Review

Diana Muela Bermejo, Rosa Tabernero Sala
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This systematic review, conducted under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Protocols (PRISMA‐P), provides the first comprehensive synthesis of empirical research on nonfiction picturebook reading in early childhood and primary education between 2000 and 2024. Drawing on 34 peer‐reviewed studies, it traces the evolution of a genre that has gained increasing curricular and editorial prominence but remains underexplored in educational practice. The review highlights the transformative potential of nonfiction picturebooks as multimodal, aesthetic, and affective texts that foster reading comprehension, visual and informational literacy, and the development of active, critical, and socially engaged readers. Methodologically, the review followed the PRISMA‐P protocol for qualitative and mixed‐methods research, guided by the Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research Type (SPIDER) framework. Studies were identified through a multi‐database search strategy—using the Web of Science (WOS), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), ProQuest, and Dialnet—and selected according to explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and analysis were carried out using Microsoft Excel and NVivo through a two‐phase coding process that combined quantitative and qualitative synthesis. Findings reveal a predominance of qualitative designs, dialogic and adult‐mediated reading strategies, and interventions conducted primarily in formal educational settings, with a strong concentration in the United States. Despite consistent evidence supporting the pedagogical value of nonfiction picturebooks, substantial gaps persist—particularly regarding autonomous reading, emotional and aesthetic responses, and research in non‐Anglophone or informal contexts such as families and libraries. By identifying the theoretical assumptions, reading strategies, and outcomes of existing research, this review positions the nonfiction picturebook not merely as an instructional tool but as a multimodal and affective medium for reimagining literacy education, nurturing curiosity, creativity, and agency in young readers across diverse educational landscapes.

Reading Research QuarterlyVol. 61(1)
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Laboratoire de Didactique André Revuz (FR)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.