Redefining accessibility: uncovering physical, cultural, and emotional barriers to urban green space accessibility

Abstract Urban green spaces (UGS) are vital for mental, physical, and social well-being; however, access remains unequal, particularly for ethnic minorities. While UGS accessibility is mainly measured by proximity, this mixed methods study explores physical, cultural, and emotional barriers through the participation of 243 survey respondents, and over 50 focus group and participatory workshop participants. Findings show that ethnic minorities use parks less frequently due to fear of dogs, cleanliness concerns linked to cultural and religious practices, perceived hostility towards group gatherings, and inadequate safety. The study highlights the limitations of purely quantitative approaches in capturing nuanced, lived experiences. It proposes a new tiered framework for UGS accessibility that incorporates emotional dimensions alongside physical ones. Evidence-based recommendations are offered for urban planners and policymakers to support inclusive and demographically sensitive UGS design. These findings contribute to advancing green equity and are globally relevant, as similar access challenges affect diverse populations worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Urban Sustainability
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00293-x
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining accessibility: uncovering physical, cultural, and emotional barriers to urban green space accessibility

Dima Albadra, C. Bennett, Nick McCullen, Sophia Hatzisavvidou et al.
3 citations
npj Urban Sustainability
Urban Green Space and Health
3.60
article

Redefining accessibility: uncovering physical, cultural, and emotional barriers to urban green space accessibility

Dima Albadra, C. Bennett, Nick McCullen, Sophia Hatzisavvidou, Zina Riadh Abdulla
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Urban green spaces (UGS) are vital for mental, physical, and social well-being; however, access remains unequal, particularly for ethnic minorities. While UGS accessibility is mainly measured by proximity, this mixed methods study explores physical, cultural, and emotional barriers through the participation of 243 survey respondents, and over 50 focus group and participatory workshop participants. Findings show that ethnic minorities use parks less frequently due to fear of dogs, cleanliness concerns linked to cultural and religious practices, perceived hostility towards group gatherings, and inadequate safety. The study highlights the limitations of purely quantitative approaches in capturing nuanced, lived experiences. It proposes a new tiered framework for UGS accessibility that incorporates emotional dimensions alongside physical ones. Evidence-based recommendations are offered for urban planners and policymakers to support inclusive and demographically sensitive UGS design. These findings contribute to advancing green equity and are globally relevant, as similar access challenges affect diverse populations worldwide.

npj Urban SustainabilityVol. 5(1)
Bristol and Bath Science Park (GB), University of Bath (GB)
University of Bath
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Green Space and Health
3.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining accessibility: uncovering physical, cultural, and emotional barriers to urban green space accessibility — Dima Albadra, C. Bennett, et al. · npj Urban Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS