Detecting Sociodemographic Biases in the Content and Quality of Large Language Model–Generated Nursing Care: Cross-Sectional Simulation Study

This study identified that LLMs systematically reproduce sociodemographic biases in the generation of nursing care plans. These biases appear in two forms: they shape the thematic content and influence expert-rated clinical quality. These findings reveal a substantial risk that such models may reinforce existing health inequities. To our knowledge, this is the first empirical evidence documenting these nuanced biases in nursing. The study also contributes a replicable framework for evaluating LLM-generated care plans. Finally, it underscores the critical need for robust human oversight to ensure that artificial intelligence serves as a tool for advancing equity rather than perpetuating disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/78132
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Sociodemographic Biases in the Content and Quality of Large Language Model–Generated Nursing Care: Cross-Sectional Simulation Study

Bing Xiang Yang, Wei Zhai, Huijing Zou, Nan Bai et al.
1 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Nursing education and management
5.41
article

Detecting Sociodemographic Biases in the Content and Quality of Large Language Model–Generated Nursing Care: Cross-Sectional Simulation Study

Bing Xiang Yang, Wei Zhai, Huijing Zou, Nan Bai, Qing Zhao, Si Chen Zhou, Guanghui Fu, Xinni Wei, Qian Liu, Jianqiang Li, Luo Chun-yan, Ying Yu, Qing Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study identified that LLMs systematically reproduce sociodemographic biases in the generation of nursing care plans. These biases appear in two forms: they shape the thematic content and influence expert-rated clinical quality. These findings reveal a substantial risk that such models may reinforce existing health inequities. To our knowledge, this is the first empirical evidence documenting these nuanced biases in nursing. The study also contributes a replicable framework for evaluating LLM-generated care plans. Finally, it underscores the critical need for robust human oversight to ensure that artificial intelligence serves as a tool for advancing equity rather than perpetuating disparities.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Wuhan University (CN), Beijing University of Technology (CN), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Wuhan Donghu University (CN), Wuchang University of Technology (CN), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (CN), Institut du Cerveau (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nursing education and management
5.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.