The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility

The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility. Moreover, the F score does not have an interpretable unit, does not allow for a comparison with a strategy assuming all are negative, and requires dichotomization of models. In contrast, standard decision-analytic measures - net benefit and decision curve analysis - allow rational and consistent choice of weighting, have an interpretable unit, can evaluate the strategy of assuming all are negative, and do not require dichotomization of continuous models. Consistent with TRIPOD AI we recommend that net benefit, alongside discrimination and calibration, be used for the evaluation of diagnostic tests and prediction models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00214-7
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility

Andrew Julian Vickers, Melissa J. Assel
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility

Andrew Julian Vickers, Melissa J. Assel
article en

Abstract

The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility. Moreover, the F score does not have an interpretable unit, does not allow for a comparison with a strategy assuming all are negative, and requires dichotomization of models. In contrast, standard decision-analytic measures - net benefit and decision curve analysis - allow rational and consistent choice of weighting, have an interpretable unit, can evaluate the strategy of assuming all are negative, and do not require dichotomization of continuous models. Consistent with TRIPOD AI we recommend that net benefit, alongside discrimination and calibration, be used for the evaluation of diagnostic tests and prediction models.

Diagnostic and Prognostic ResearchVol. 9(1)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.