The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility
The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility. Moreover, the F score does not have an interpretable unit, does not allow for a comparison with a strategy assuming all are negative, and requires dichotomization of models. In contrast, standard decision-analytic measures - net benefit and decision curve analysis - allow rational and consistent choice of weighting, have an interpretable unit, can evaluate the strategy of assuming all are negative, and do not require dichotomization of continuous models. Consistent with TRIPOD AI we recommend that net benefit, alongside discrimination and calibration, be used for the evaluation of diagnostic tests and prediction models.
Authors
- Andrew Julian Vickers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-6503)
- Melissa J. Assel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6344-9371)
Institutions
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
- Published
- 2025-12-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00214-7
- Primary Topic
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute