Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), and Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) as ideological apparatuses: Sustainability and the new hegemony in emerging markets

This article critically examines the diffusion of Corporate Social Responsibility; Environmental, Social, and Governance frameworks; and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in emerging markets. While often presented as neutral instruments of ethical business and sustainable development, we argue that these frameworks function as Sustainability Ideological State Apparatuses that embed, naturalize, and reproduce dominant ideologies under the guise of responsible management. Drawing on theory of ideology and theory of hegemony, we show how organizations are positioned as compliant sustainability subjects, while Western-centric norms are legitimized and internalized—often at the expense of local priorities, capacities, and epistemologies. This process constitutes a form of ideological colonization, wherein global sustainability standards displace alternative models rooted in local knowledge systems. This study illustrates how small and medium-sized enterprises in the Global South resist, reinterpret, and reconfigure these frameworks through contextually grounded practices. Our analysis contributes to Management Learning by reframing sustainability as a contested space of power, knowledge, and resistance. We call for more reflexive, decolonial approaches to organizational learning that foreground local agency and critically interrogate the ideological undercurrents embedded in global sustainability discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Learning
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076251380390
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), and Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) as ideological apparatuses: Sustainability and the new hegemony in emerging markets

Eric Ping Hung Li, Magnum Lam, Xinzhou Qi, A. Taji
Management Learning
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), and Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) as ideological apparatuses: Sustainability and the new hegemony in emerging markets

Eric Ping Hung Li, Magnum Lam, Xinzhou Qi, A. Taji
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the diffusion of Corporate Social Responsibility; Environmental, Social, and Governance frameworks; and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in emerging markets. While often presented as neutral instruments of ethical business and sustainable development, we argue that these frameworks function as Sustainability Ideological State Apparatuses that embed, naturalize, and reproduce dominant ideologies under the guise of responsible management. Drawing on theory of ideology and theory of hegemony, we show how organizations are positioned as compliant sustainability subjects, while Western-centric norms are legitimized and internalized—often at the expense of local priorities, capacities, and epistemologies. This process constitutes a form of ideological colonization, wherein global sustainability standards displace alternative models rooted in local knowledge systems. This study illustrates how small and medium-sized enterprises in the Global South resist, reinterpret, and reconfigure these frameworks through contextually grounded practices. Our analysis contributes to Management Learning by reframing sustainability as a contested space of power, knowledge, and resistance. We call for more reflexive, decolonial approaches to organizational learning that foreground local agency and critically interrogate the ideological undercurrents embedded in global sustainability discourse.

Management Learning
University of British Columbia (CA), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.