Do slowly expanding lesions correspond to chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions? An integrated imaging analysis study

Abstract Chronic active lesions (CALs) are a hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology, associated with extensive tissue damage, disability progression, and overall disease burden. Histopathologically, they consist of a hypocellular core surrounded by a rim of iron-laden, chronically activated microglia/macrophages. Proposed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of CALs are paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) or slowly expanding lesions (SELs), detected respectively on susceptibility-based images or on longitudinal conventional MRI. While PRLs are histopathologically validated in vivo correlates of CALs, SELs lack pathological validation. In this study, we examine the relationship between SELs and PRLs and evaluate the robustness of the SEL detection algorithm in 56 MS participants, all imaged using a strictly homogeneous protocol on the same 3T scanner for three consecutive timepoints. PRLs included distinct subgroups of both shrinking and expanding lesions (p < 0.001), challenging the assumption that CALs necessarily expand over time. SEL detection demonstrated instability across different input resolution and segmentation methods, yielding a mean dice similarity score of 0.375. In random forest analysis, SEL volume showed inconsistent and weaker predictive value for MS disability and severity (EDSS, MSSS) compared to PRL volume. Critically, lesion-level overlap between SELs and PRLs was negligible (Cohen’s κ = –0.022) once corrected for overlap by chance. Taken together, our findings indicate that SELs and PRLs are essentially independent, underscoring the need for a refined longitudinal volumetric definition to establish a reliable CALs’ biomarker.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.03.25341192
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do slowly expanding lesions correspond to chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions? An integrated imaging analysis study

Martina Absinta, Serena Borrelli, Pietro Maggi, Benoit M. M. Macq et al.
medRxiv
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Do slowly expanding lesions correspond to chronic active multiple sclerosis lesions? An integrated imaging analysis study

Martina Absinta, Serena Borrelli, Pietro Maggi, Benoit M. M. Macq, Anna Stölting, Colin Vanden Bulcke, Meritxell Bach Cuadra
article en

Abstract

Abstract Chronic active lesions (CALs) are a hallmark of multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology, associated with extensive tissue damage, disability progression, and overall disease burden. Histopathologically, they consist of a hypocellular core surrounded by a rim of iron-laden, chronically activated microglia/macrophages. Proposed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of CALs are paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) or slowly expanding lesions (SELs), detected respectively on susceptibility-based images or on longitudinal conventional MRI. While PRLs are histopathologically validated in vivo correlates of CALs, SELs lack pathological validation. In this study, we examine the relationship between SELs and PRLs and evaluate the robustness of the SEL detection algorithm in 56 MS participants, all imaged using a strictly homogeneous protocol on the same 3T scanner for three consecutive timepoints. PRLs included distinct subgroups of both shrinking and expanding lesions (p < 0.001), challenging the assumption that CALs necessarily expand over time. SEL detection demonstrated instability across different input resolution and segmentation methods, yielding a mean dice similarity score of 0.375. In random forest analysis, SEL volume showed inconsistent and weaker predictive value for MS disability and severity (EDSS, MSSS) compared to PRL volume. Critically, lesion-level overlap between SELs and PRLs was negligible (Cohen’s κ = –0.022) once corrected for overlap by chance. Taken together, our findings indicate that SELs and PRLs are essentially independent, underscoring the need for a refined longitudinal volumetric definition to establish a reliable CALs’ biomarker.

medRxiv
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), UCLouvain (BE), University of Lausanne (CH)
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.