The Future of Research in Cognitive Robotics: Foundation Models or Developmental Cognitive Models?

Robotics research has recently embraced foundation models as an attractive way to enhance different elements of the robotics stack and to simplify the challenge of instructing robots to perform tasks. While there is increasing evidence that this may be a very useful approach, there are also many concerns with making this the exclusive route to the future of robotics, e.g., cost, availability, trustworthiness, robustness, transparency, security, and inclusion. In this article, we will explore an alternative future for robotics research, one which eschews foundation models and deep learning with internet‐scale datasets, and adopts instead an approach that has more in common with cognitive development in humans, exploiting knowledge of cognitive science while at the same time using experience in building cognitive robots to make contributions to both cognitive robotics and cognitive science. Such approaches are more aligned with the enactive stance in embodied cognitive science, in contrast with the disembodied computational functionalism of cognitivist approaches, of which foundation models are the most contemporary instance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Robotics Research
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adrr.202500066
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of Research in Cognitive Robotics: Foundation Models or Developmental Cognitive Models?

David Vernon
Advanced Robotics Research
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

The Future of Research in Cognitive Robotics: Foundation Models or Developmental Cognitive Models?

David Vernon
article en

Abstract

Robotics research has recently embraced foundation models as an attractive way to enhance different elements of the robotics stack and to simplify the challenge of instructing robots to perform tasks. While there is increasing evidence that this may be a very useful approach, there are also many concerns with making this the exclusive route to the future of robotics, e.g., cost, availability, trustworthiness, robustness, transparency, security, and inclusion. In this article, we will explore an alternative future for robotics research, one which eschews foundation models and deep learning with internet‐scale datasets, and adopts instead an approach that has more in common with cognitive development in humans, exploiting knowledge of cognitive science while at the same time using experience in building cognitive robots to make contributions to both cognitive robotics and cognitive science. Such approaches are more aligned with the enactive stance in embodied cognitive science, in contrast with the disembodied computational functionalism of cognitivist approaches, of which foundation models are the most contemporary instance.

Advanced Robotics Research
Vernon College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Future of Research in Cognitive Robotics: Foundation Models or Developmental Cognitive Models? — David Vernon · Advanced Robotics Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS