Boosting public support for climate policy through information provision: insights from German survey experiments

Abstract Despite being an economists’ favorite, carbon pricing suffers from limited public support, undermining the feasibility of target-consistent prices. Revenue rebating is frequently considered as a remedy. Across two experiments, we examine whether support rises when people receive (i) information about how carbon pricing and rebates work and (ii) personalized feedback on their carbon footprints and expected net monetary impact under carbon pricing with equal-per-capita rebates. Explaining how carbon pricing steers consumption and the administrative cost of rebates increase support. Most respondents hold inconsistent beliefs: they think their carbon footprint is below average but still expect to lose money after the rebate. Personalized feedback induces partial belief updating and increases support for carbon pricing among respondents who would actually gain, while support by net losers is not significantly affected. Our findings highlight the need for transparent, economics-based communication of climate policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00317-3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boosting public support for climate policy through information provision: insights from German survey experiments

Cornelia Betsch, Maximilian Kellner, Lena Lehrer, Mirjam A. Jenny et al.
npj Climate Action
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Boosting public support for climate policy through information provision: insights from German survey experiments

Cornelia Betsch, Maximilian Kellner, Lena Lehrer, Mirjam A. Jenny, Karolina Rütten, Mattis Geiger, Hellen Temme
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite being an economists’ favorite, carbon pricing suffers from limited public support, undermining the feasibility of target-consistent prices. Revenue rebating is frequently considered as a remedy. Across two experiments, we examine whether support rises when people receive (i) information about how carbon pricing and rebates work and (ii) personalized feedback on their carbon footprints and expected net monetary impact under carbon pricing with equal-per-capita rebates. Explaining how carbon pricing steers consumption and the administrative cost of rebates increase support. Most respondents hold inconsistent beliefs: they think their carbon footprint is below average but still expect to lose money after the rebate. Personalized feedback induces partial belief updating and increases support for carbon pricing among respondents who would actually gain, while support by net losers is not significantly affected. Our findings highlight the need for transparent, economics-based communication of climate policy.

npj Climate ActionVol. 4(1)
University of Potsdam (DE), University of Erfurt (DE), University of Applied Sciences Erfurt (DE), Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE), Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.