Evaluation of a free mail-in opt-out STI testing programme on 3-month rescreening rates in reproductive health centres
A 4% increase in rescreening rates did not justify programme continuation. While rescreening has been an important public health strategy to reduce sexually transmitted infections (STIs), this programme reveals that high rates of rescreening may not be possible. Recommending rescreening and making it free, convenient and automatic is not enough. Without new ideas and approaches to tackling this public health problem, STI reinfection and resulting reproductive health complications will persist.
Authors
- Stephanie Small (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6364-8266)
- E De Jager (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-8231)
- Vicki Hart
- J L Emery (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3353-3570)
- Olivia A Tarmey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9213-4638)
Institutions
- University of Vermont (US)
- Planned Parenthood (US)
- Technology Service Corporation (United States) (US)
- United Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- National Labor College (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sexually Transmitted Infections
- Published
- 2025-12-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2025-056648
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive tract infections research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00