Informal Finance and Its Regulation: A Comparison of South Africa and Zambia

Unregulated or weakly regulated financial institutions remain important providers of financial services across Sub-Saharan Africa. This study examines how such institutions operate in South Africa and Zambia, which represent contrasting regulatory approaches-restrictive and enabling, respectively. Drawing on qualitative interviews with providers and users, this research finds that group-based savings-and-credit associations and private money lending remain central in both contexts. In South Africa, savings groups are more closely connected with banks, while private money lending is criminalized. The findings suggest scope for regulatory convergence toward a more plural and competitive financial sector, one that actively supports savings groups while adopting less punitive approaches to private money lending.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Administrative Sciences
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15120480
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informal Finance and Its Regulation: A Comparison of South Africa and Zambia

Munacinga Simatele, James Copestake, Mongi Tshaka
Administrative Sciences
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Informal Finance and Its Regulation: A Comparison of South Africa and Zambia

Munacinga Simatele, James Copestake, Mongi Tshaka
article en

Abstract

Unregulated or weakly regulated financial institutions remain important providers of financial services across Sub-Saharan Africa. This study examines how such institutions operate in South Africa and Zambia, which represent contrasting regulatory approaches-restrictive and enabling, respectively. Drawing on qualitative interviews with providers and users, this research finds that group-based savings-and-credit associations and private money lending remain central in both contexts. In South Africa, savings groups are more closely connected with banks, while private money lending is criminalized. The findings suggest scope for regulatory convergence toward a more plural and competitive financial sector, one that actively supports savings groups while adopting less punitive approaches to private money lending.

Administrative SciencesVol. 15(12)
University of Fort Hare (ZA), University of Bath (GB)
University of Fort Hare
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Informal Finance and Its Regulation: A Comparison of South Africa and Zambia — Munacinga Simatele, James Copestake, et al. · Administrative Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS