Revisiting the Rocks of Ages: The Ontology of Human Development as a Sample Case of Meaningful Collaborations Between the Magisteriums of Science and Religion

We argue for the possibility of creating a mutually-meaningful and mutually-consequential collaboration between the Magisteriums of Religion and Science by providing a sample case about how fundamental issues in understanding the ontology of being human within developmental science align with corresponding ontological issues within instances of Judeo-Christian theology. We illustrate how two specific areas of collaboration—palliative care that sustains meaning, mattering, and dignity within individuals in the end-of-life period, and promoting earth stewardship that addresses challenges to sustaining a habitable planet for human life—are instances of opportunities for meaningful integrations of the two Magisteriums. We hope that our sample case may be persuasive enough to motivate scientists and theologians with knowledge of other areas within their respective Magisteriums to generate additional sample cases. We call for collaborative actions to demonstrate that mutually beneficial exchanges between the two Magisteriums can result in new spiritual knowledge of mutual significance to the teaching authorities of both science and religion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16121545
Primary Topic
Evolution and Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Rocks of Ages: The Ontology of Human Development as a Sample Case of Meaningful Collaborations Between the Magisteriums of Science and Religion

Pamela Ebstyne King, Edmond P. Bowers, Elizabeth M. Dowling, Richard M. Lerner
Religions
Evolution and Science Education
article

Revisiting the Rocks of Ages: The Ontology of Human Development as a Sample Case of Meaningful Collaborations Between the Magisteriums of Science and Religion

Pamela Ebstyne King, Edmond P. Bowers, Elizabeth M. Dowling, Richard M. Lerner
article en

Abstract

We argue for the possibility of creating a mutually-meaningful and mutually-consequential collaboration between the Magisteriums of Religion and Science by providing a sample case about how fundamental issues in understanding the ontology of being human within developmental science align with corresponding ontological issues within instances of Judeo-Christian theology. We illustrate how two specific areas of collaboration—palliative care that sustains meaning, mattering, and dignity within individuals in the end-of-life period, and promoting earth stewardship that addresses challenges to sustaining a habitable planet for human life—are instances of opportunities for meaningful integrations of the two Magisteriums. We hope that our sample case may be persuasive enough to motivate scientists and theologians with knowledge of other areas within their respective Magisteriums to generate additional sample cases. We call for collaborative actions to demonstrate that mutually beneficial exchanges between the two Magisteriums can result in new spiritual knowledge of mutual significance to the teaching authorities of both science and religion.

ReligionsVol. 16(12)
Tufts University (US), Clemson University (US), Fuller Theological Seminary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Evolution and Science Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.