Exploring dual pathways for traditional pattern innovation: shape grammar and diffusion models

Traditional decorative motifs embody rich cultural heritage, yet innovating such patterns without eroding their essence remains challenging. This study systematically compares rule-based Shape Grammar and AI-driven Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM) for “Baoxiang” pattern design. We assembled a dataset of Baoxiang images via Python scripts from online galleries and museum collections, then employed the Segment Anything Model (SAM) to isolate key motif elements. Both Shape Grammar and DDPM were used to generate novel designs, which were evaluated through a public survey assessing innovation, aesthetics, complexity, and cultural fidelity. ANOVA confirmed that Shape Grammar better preserves traditional structure, whereas DDPM delivers greater creative diversity. These findings highlight complementary strengths of each approach and inform future hybrid methodologies for culturally respectful pattern innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Heritage Science
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01977-4
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring dual pathways for traditional pattern innovation: shape grammar and diffusion models

Ting Xiong, Nanyi Wang
npj Heritage Science
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

Exploring dual pathways for traditional pattern innovation: shape grammar and diffusion models

Ting Xiong, Nanyi Wang
article en

Abstract

Traditional decorative motifs embody rich cultural heritage, yet innovating such patterns without eroding their essence remains challenging. This study systematically compares rule-based Shape Grammar and AI-driven Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM) for “Baoxiang” pattern design. We assembled a dataset of Baoxiang images via Python scripts from online galleries and museum collections, then employed the Segment Anything Model (SAM) to isolate key motif elements. Both Shape Grammar and DDPM were used to generate novel designs, which were evaluated through a public survey assessing innovation, aesthetics, complexity, and cultural fidelity. ANOVA confirmed that Shape Grammar better preserves traditional structure, whereas DDPM delivers greater creative diversity. These findings highlight complementary strengths of each approach and inform future hybrid methodologies for culturally respectful pattern innovation.

npj Heritage ScienceVol. 13(1)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.