The Interview Trap: A systematic review on factors affecting the validity of Employment Interviews

<ns3:p>This article examines factors that compromise the validity and reliability of employment interview selection processes, with a focus on the influence of interviewer bias, format, and decision-making processes. The purpose of the present Systematic Review (SR) is to determine how different types and formats of interview modalities affect the selection process, consolidate empirical findings regarding the influence of the most widespread interviewer biases, and identify bias mitigation strategies that can enhance the interview selection process. The methodology used PECO and PRISMA criteria to identify keywords, define search strings, and 19 full review articles published between 2015 and 2025 in peer-reviewed journals. This time frame captures the most recent developments and relevant research, recognizing the opportunity to reflect this under-researched area, specifically the role of bias and interview format in employment selection processes. The results emphasize the importance of pre-and post-interview reflection, interviewer preparedness, and gathering applicant feedback to refine selection decisions. In conclusion, the interview process can be improved by offering interviewer refresher training, utilizing recorded interviews to minimize the effects of selective memory, and implementing bias-mitigation strategies, such as job analysis and interviewer self-awareness, to enhance the validity and reliability of employment selection interviews.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.168805.1
Primary Topic
Employer Branding and e-HRM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Interview Trap: A systematic review on factors affecting the validity of Employment Interviews

Aída López Serrano, Hernán Morales
F1000Research
Employer Branding and e-HRM
article

The Interview Trap: A systematic review on factors affecting the validity of Employment Interviews

Aída López Serrano, Hernán Morales
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>This article examines factors that compromise the validity and reliability of employment interview selection processes, with a focus on the influence of interviewer bias, format, and decision-making processes. The purpose of the present Systematic Review (SR) is to determine how different types and formats of interview modalities affect the selection process, consolidate empirical findings regarding the influence of the most widespread interviewer biases, and identify bias mitigation strategies that can enhance the interview selection process. The methodology used PECO and PRISMA criteria to identify keywords, define search strings, and 19 full review articles published between 2015 and 2025 in peer-reviewed journals. This time frame captures the most recent developments and relevant research, recognizing the opportunity to reflect this under-researched area, specifically the role of bias and interview format in employment selection processes. The results emphasize the importance of pre-and post-interview reflection, interviewer preparedness, and gathering applicant feedback to refine selection decisions. In conclusion, the interview process can be improved by offering interviewer refresher training, utilizing recorded interviews to minimize the effects of selective memory, and implementing bias-mitigation strategies, such as job analysis and interviewer self-awareness, to enhance the validity and reliability of employment selection interviews.</ns3:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 14
University of Miami (US), Jackson Health System (US), Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES)
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Employer Branding and e-HRM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.