Soil Carbon Sequestration Policy in Australia: The Additionality Dilemma

ABSTRACT The Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) Scheme provides opportunities for farmers to benefit financially from sequestering additional carbon in their soils. The Scheme assesses additionality using a ‘newness’ test; if one of a list of eligible farming practices was not used by a farmer in a 5‐year baseline period, its use within the project is considered to be additional. However, this approach is unable to detect non‐additionality in cases where farmer adoption of the eligible farming practice is increasing in the absence of carbon credits. This analysis uses parameters from the actual scheme, combined with soil carbon sequestration rates informed by scientific research, and calculates net financial benefits to farmers from participation in the soil carbon method of the ACCU Scheme. In most scenarios modelled in this study, the net benefits to farmers from participating in the soil carbon scheme are small relative to other costs and revenues from farming (assuming that a recognised existing design problem with the scheme that is causing over‐crediting is corrected). As a result, the area of additional projects is relatively small and can easily be outweighed by non‐additional projects. Therefore, the expenditure on ACCUs required to achieve a tonne of genuine CO 2 ‐e mitigation can be extremely high: up to 80 times higher than the cost of an ACCU in one of the scenarios explored. The prospects of developing a system that accurately assesses the additionality of soil carbon projects seem remote.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70076
Primary Topic
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Carbon Sequestration Policy in Australia: The Additionality Dilemma

David J. Pannell
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
article

Soil Carbon Sequestration Policy in Australia: The Additionality Dilemma

David J. Pannell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) Scheme provides opportunities for farmers to benefit financially from sequestering additional carbon in their soils. The Scheme assesses additionality using a ‘newness’ test; if one of a list of eligible farming practices was not used by a farmer in a 5‐year baseline period, its use within the project is considered to be additional. However, this approach is unable to detect non‐additionality in cases where farmer adoption of the eligible farming practice is increasing in the absence of carbon credits. This analysis uses parameters from the actual scheme, combined with soil carbon sequestration rates informed by scientific research, and calculates net financial benefits to farmers from participation in the soil carbon method of the ACCU Scheme. In most scenarios modelled in this study, the net benefits to farmers from participating in the soil carbon scheme are small relative to other costs and revenues from farming (assuming that a recognised existing design problem with the scheme that is causing over‐crediting is corrected). As a result, the area of additional projects is relatively small and can easily be outweighed by non‐additional projects. Therefore, the expenditure on ACCUs required to achieve a tonne of genuine CO 2 ‐e mitigation can be extremely high: up to 80 times higher than the cost of an ACCU in one of the scenarios explored. The prospects of developing a system that accurately assesses the additionality of soil carbon projects seem remote.

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.