Performance of large language models in non-English medical ethics-related multiple choice questions: comparison of ChatGPT performance across versions and languages

ChatGPT demonstrated substantial improvements in medical ethics MCQ performance across versions, particularly in terms of consistency and accuracy. However, performance disparities between languages and reduced accuracy under masked answer conditions highlight the ongoing limitations of non-English ethical reasoning and context recognition. These findings emphasize the need for further research on language-sensitive fine-tuning and the evaluation of LLMs in specialized ethical domains. The findings suggest that advanced LLMs may serve as valuable supplementary tools in medical education and clinical ethics training. At the same time, the observed language disparities call for context-sensitive adaptations to prevent inequities in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01316-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of large language models in non-English medical ethics-related multiple choice questions: comparison of ChatGPT performance across versions and languages

Y.L. Kim, Sang-Ho Yoo, Seungho Shin
1 citations
BMC Medical Ethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Performance of large language models in non-English medical ethics-related multiple choice questions: comparison of ChatGPT performance across versions and languages

Y.L. Kim, Sang-Ho Yoo, Seungho Shin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ChatGPT demonstrated substantial improvements in medical ethics MCQ performance across versions, particularly in terms of consistency and accuracy. However, performance disparities between languages and reduced accuracy under masked answer conditions highlight the ongoing limitations of non-English ethical reasoning and context recognition. These findings emphasize the need for further research on language-sensitive fine-tuning and the evaluation of LLMs in specialized ethical domains. The findings suggest that advanced LLMs may serve as valuable supplementary tools in medical education and clinical ethics training. At the same time, the observed language disparities call for context-sensitive adaptations to prevent inequities in practice.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 26(1)
Hanyang University Medical Center (KR), Hanyang University (KR), Anyang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.