Assessing and improving social equity in marine conservation: background, methods and guidance on three approaches

Social equity is increasingly recognised as a fundamental principle in marine conservation. Global conservation policies now contain commitments to equitable management and governance, yet practical guidance on how to understand and assess equity in marine conservation remains limited. In this methodological paper, we introduce our process for developing three conceptually grounded, practical and adaptable approaches for assessing equity in marine conservation: (1) a rapid equity assessment, (2) a stakeholders and rightsholders equity assessment, and (3) a co-produced and customised equity assessment. All three approaches emphasise the assessment process as part of an ongoing learning journey that requires continuous reflection and adaptive actions to improve social equity. The discussion identifies practical lessons and key considerations for choosing, preparing and carrying out equity assessments and for moving from assessment to action to improve social equity in marine conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PARKS
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2305/rcbs3096
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing and improving social equity in marine conservation: background, methods and guidance on three approaches

Gerald G. Singh, Nathan James Bennett, Samiya Ahmed Selim, Priscila F. M. Lopes et al.
PARKS
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
article

Assessing and improving social equity in marine conservation: background, methods and guidance on three approaches

Gerald G. Singh, Nathan James Bennett, Samiya Ahmed Selim, Priscila F. M. Lopes, Juno Fitzpatrick, Ella-Kari Muhl, Phil Franks, Sebastián Villasante, Shauna L. Mahajan, Joachim Claudet, Katina Roumbedakis, Elena M. Finkbeiner, Georgina G. Gurney, Jacqueline Lau, David Gill, Neil Dawson, Jessica L. Blythe, Kira Sullivan-Wiley, Mia Strand, Mark Andrachuk, Stacy D. Jupiter, Timur Jack-Kadıoğlu, Josheena Naggae
article en

Abstract

Social equity is increasingly recognised as a fundamental principle in marine conservation. Global conservation policies now contain commitments to equitable management and governance, yet practical guidance on how to understand and assess equity in marine conservation remains limited. In this methodological paper, we introduce our process for developing three conceptually grounded, practical and adaptable approaches for assessing equity in marine conservation: (1) a rapid equity assessment, (2) a stakeholders and rightsholders equity assessment, and (3) a co-produced and customised equity assessment. All three approaches emphasise the assessment process as part of an ongoing learning journey that requires continuous reflection and adaptive actions to improve social equity. The discussion identifies practical lessons and key considerations for choosing, preparing and carrying out equity assessments and for moving from assessment to action to improve social equity in marine conservation.

PARKS
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Pew Charitable Trusts (US), United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (TH), University of Waterloo (CA), Duke University (US), Brock University (CA), International Institute for Environment and Development (GB), University of California System (US), University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (BD), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR), Arcus Foundation (GB), World Wildlife Fund (US), Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom (GB), Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX), James Cook University (AU), Stanford University (US)
WWF International
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.