Ecosystem carbon and nitrogen recovery in restored coastal wetlands

Coastal wetland restoration is a nature-based solution to mitigate climate change and eutrophication through carbon and nitrogen storage. However, the effects of different restoration practices on ecosystem carbon and nitrogen dynamics remain unclear. Here we conducted a global meta-analysis on the recovery rates of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and plant biomass carbon in 110 salt marsh and 190 mangrove sites under various restoration types. Restored coastal wetlands achieved 37–76% of soil carbon, 43–83% of soil nitrogen, and 34–119% of plant biomass carbon relative to natural wetlands, due to different practices. Plant biomass requires ~20 years to reach natural levels, whereas soil carbon and nitrogen stocks require ~40 years. Remediated wetlands have lower recovery resistance than created wetlands, and the recovery efficiency is influenced by engineering approaches, vegetation regrowth, soil properties, and hydrological conditions. These insights help optimize land-sea coordination projects for improving carbon and nitrogen recovery. Plant biomass carbon in restored wetlands requires about 20 years to reach natural levels while soil carbon and nitrogen stocks need 40 years to recover, suggests a meta-analysis of 110 salt marsh and 190 mangrove sites under various restoration types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03036-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecosystem carbon and nitrogen recovery in restored coastal wetlands

Zhen‐Ming Ge, Xuechu Chen, Richard Bellerby, Zeng Zhou et al.
1 citations
Communications Earth & Environment
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.72
article

Ecosystem carbon and nitrogen recovery in restored coastal wetlands

Zhen‐Ming Ge, Xuechu Chen, Richard Bellerby, Zeng Zhou, Pei Xin, Ke-Hua Zhu, Xiuzhen Li, Chen Shang, Hua-Yu Chen, Wei Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Coastal wetland restoration is a nature-based solution to mitigate climate change and eutrophication through carbon and nitrogen storage. However, the effects of different restoration practices on ecosystem carbon and nitrogen dynamics remain unclear. Here we conducted a global meta-analysis on the recovery rates of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and plant biomass carbon in 110 salt marsh and 190 mangrove sites under various restoration types. Restored coastal wetlands achieved 37–76% of soil carbon, 43–83% of soil nitrogen, and 34–119% of plant biomass carbon relative to natural wetlands, due to different practices. Plant biomass requires ~20 years to reach natural levels, whereas soil carbon and nitrogen stocks require ~40 years. Remediated wetlands have lower recovery resistance than created wetlands, and the recovery efficiency is influenced by engineering approaches, vegetation regrowth, soil properties, and hydrological conditions. These insights help optimize land-sea coordination projects for improving carbon and nitrogen recovery. Plant biomass carbon in restored wetlands requires about 20 years to reach natural levels while soil carbon and nitrogen stocks need 40 years to recover, suggests a meta-analysis of 110 salt marsh and 190 mangrove sites under various restoration types.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 7(1)
Hohai University (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NO), First Institute of Oceanography (CN), Shanghai Estuarine & Coastal Science Research Center (CN)
European Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.