Rethinking global health financing: from philanthropy to public good

Global health financing has been dominated by philanthropic and donor-driven vertical programs over the past two decades. While this model has achieved major public health gains, it has also entrenched power asymmetries, fostered fragmentation, and undermined the sustainability and sovereignty of health systems in low- and middle-income countries. This perspective critiques the ethical and practical shortcomings of donor-driven approaches, including the marginalization of local ownership and democratic accountability. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of relying on voluntary, unpredictable funding and underscored the need for a shift toward treating health as a global public good. The paper argues for a transition to more sustainable models based on domestic resource mobilization, pooled multilateral funding, and participatory governance, and outlines concrete recommendations for reform. Transitioning to a public goods approach requires reforming funding mechanisms to enhance predictability and alignment with national priorities, embedding participatory budgeting and accountability frameworks, and investing in health systems and governance. A new social contract grounded in solidarity, equity, and shared responsibility is essential to secure health for all.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Health Research and Policy
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00462-6
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking global health financing: from philanthropy to public good

Augustus Osborne
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Rethinking global health financing: from philanthropy to public good

Augustus Osborne
article en

Abstract

Global health financing has been dominated by philanthropic and donor-driven vertical programs over the past two decades. While this model has achieved major public health gains, it has also entrenched power asymmetries, fostered fragmentation, and undermined the sustainability and sovereignty of health systems in low- and middle-income countries. This perspective critiques the ethical and practical shortcomings of donor-driven approaches, including the marginalization of local ownership and democratic accountability. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of relying on voluntary, unpredictable funding and underscored the need for a shift toward treating health as a global public good. The paper argues for a transition to more sustainable models based on domestic resource mobilization, pooled multilateral funding, and participatory governance, and outlines concrete recommendations for reform. Transitioning to a public goods approach requires reforming funding mechanisms to enhance predictability and alignment with national priorities, embedding participatory budgeting and accountability frameworks, and investing in health systems and governance. A new social contract grounded in solidarity, equity, and shared responsibility is essential to secure health for all.

Global Health Research and PolicyVol. 10(1)
Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre (SL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.