Transactivity Despite Complexity: Promoting Group Discussions in the Context of Socioscientific Issues

Abstract There is a need for support in addressing complex socio-scientific issues (SSIs) in science lessons. Therefore, this study analyzes the quality of students’ group discussions against the background of functionally varying degrees of instruction to enhance both complexity management and broad participation. The instructional approach comprises a process-structuring tool, target-mat, as the core of the teaching strategy. The corresponding intervention was conducted in 29 group discussions regarding a local biodiversity conflict among 8th-grade students. On the basis of qualitative content analysis and subsequent code quantification, the results indicate that directly instructed discussion activities, such as compliance with discussion phases, were successfully realized. In addition, discussion activities that were not explicitly instructed, such as active participation and referring to peers’ statements in terms of transactivity, were, nevertheless, frequently observed. Furthermore, the frequency of these noninstructed activities correlates significantly with the controversial character of the discussion topic. These results are attributed to the balanced combination of guided and student-directed activities and are interpreted as core features of discussion quality. The implications for teaching and educational research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Science Education
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10304-7
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transactivity Despite Complexity: Promoting Group Discussions in the Context of Socioscientific Issues

Anke Meisert, Florian Böttcher, Maren Koberstein‐Schwarz, Maria Jafari et al.
Research in Science Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Transactivity Despite Complexity: Promoting Group Discussions in the Context of Socioscientific Issues

Anke Meisert, Florian Böttcher, Maren Koberstein‐Schwarz, Maria Jafari, René Leubecher, Jürgen Menthe, Christina Priert
article en

Abstract

Abstract There is a need for support in addressing complex socio-scientific issues (SSIs) in science lessons. Therefore, this study analyzes the quality of students’ group discussions against the background of functionally varying degrees of instruction to enhance both complexity management and broad participation. The instructional approach comprises a process-structuring tool, target-mat, as the core of the teaching strategy. The corresponding intervention was conducted in 29 group discussions regarding a local biodiversity conflict among 8th-grade students. On the basis of qualitative content analysis and subsequent code quantification, the results indicate that directly instructed discussion activities, such as compliance with discussion phases, were successfully realized. In addition, discussion activities that were not explicitly instructed, such as active participation and referring to peers’ statements in terms of transactivity, were, nevertheless, frequently observed. Furthermore, the frequency of these noninstructed activities correlates significantly with the controversial character of the discussion topic. These results are attributed to the balanced combination of guided and student-directed activities and are interpreted as core features of discussion quality. The implications for teaching and educational research are discussed.

Research in Science Education
Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Hildesheim (DE), Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.