‘The Last New Novel’: Valuation Strategies in Reviews of Fiction Published in the <em>Athenaeum </em>and the <em>Saturday Review</em>, 1855–59

This article investigates two seminal Victorian periodicals during the critical period of 1855–59 — the Athenaeum (1828–1921) and the Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science and Art (1855–1938). I examine the rhetorical and typological strategies underlying the attribution of value in reviews of fiction and illustrate the generic complexity of this prominent form. I show that, beyond its overt interest in enabling or preventing the sale of novels, the mid-century book review takes an economic outlook in the methodological and hermeneutic processes through which literary value is defined and communicated by reviewers. Reviewers writing for the two periodicals at hand can be seen to display an economic orientation in their typology and epistemology, employing forms of quantification that stretch from the counting of specific elements to the abstract non-numerical calculation mimicking the logic of a balance sheet customary in commercial bookkeeping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Periodical Studies
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21825/jeps.92011
Primary Topic
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘The Last New Novel’: Valuation Strategies in Reviews of Fiction Published in the Athenaeum and the Saturday Review, 1855–59

Anne‐Marie Millim
Journal of European Periodical Studies
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
article

‘The Last New Novel’: Valuation Strategies in Reviews of Fiction Published in the Athenaeum and the Saturday Review, 1855–59

Anne‐Marie Millim
article en

Abstract

This article investigates two seminal Victorian periodicals during the critical period of 1855–59 — the Athenaeum (1828–1921) and the Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science and Art (1855–1938). I examine the rhetorical and typological strategies underlying the attribution of value in reviews of fiction and illustrate the generic complexity of this prominent form. I show that, beyond its overt interest in enabling or preventing the sale of novels, the mid-century book review takes an economic outlook in the methodological and hermeneutic processes through which literary value is defined and communicated by reviewers. Reviewers writing for the two periodicals at hand can be seen to display an economic orientation in their typology and epistemology, employing forms of quantification that stretch from the counting of specific elements to the abstract non-numerical calculation mimicking the logic of a balance sheet customary in commercial bookkeeping.

Journal of European Periodical StudiesVol. 10(2)
University of Luxembourg (LU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.